[net.music] People who talk about outgrowing rock & roll should grow up

blickstein@orphan.DEC (Dave Blickstein DTN: 381-2096) (04/03/84)

My father said the very same thing to me.  He gave rock and roll only 5 years.
It's now 12 years later and I listen to more rock and more kinds of rock than
anything else.  In fact, the converse of his prediction has happened: I hardly
ever listen to classical anymore.

I think one of the main reasons is that I find rock and roll much more 
enjoyable to play than classical (I had about 10 years of classical piano
training, I now play mostly electric guitar).  In terms of performing, I
find rock more social, more expressive, more creative and often very
exciting.  It's an incredible high by itself (I don't do drugs).

To be honest, my opinion of classical musicians is that they are typically
not creative.   Their sole area for expression and creativity is in the
limited area of interpretation.  When I was playing piano, I was trained to
be able to play the notes perfectly as written and try to add as much
expression and emotion as possible within those constraints.  Often, even
that part is written into the music (via crescendo marks, ritards, etc.)

I really feel that rock musicians who compose music that is fresh and original
and presents a new style are contributing more to the art of music than
all but a few classical musicians.

	db