bartonr@jove.cs.pdx.edu (Robert Barton) (01/22/90)
gsarff@sarek.UUCP (Gary Sarff) writes: > In what way does a HAM-E picture not adhere to IFF? The "magic cookie" is a > series of specific pixel values, _BUT_ it is in the _BODY_ hunk of the IFF > file that this will appear. You might want to try checking the IFF documentation on ILBMs some time. It's in the "Includes & Autodocs" manual. Under BODY it states: "The source raster is stored in a 'BODY' chunk" and "The BODY's content is a concatenation of scan lines". No mention of cookies, magic or otherwise. > Also, the color registers that the new modes use are in subsequent scan lines > of the _BODY_. No mention of storing color register data in the BODY either. That's what a CMAP chunk is for.