[comp.sys.amiga] Amiga 2000 w/GVP vs Amiga 2500

jdsb@occrsh.ATT.COM (John_Babcock) (03/07/90)

** I'm posting for a friend.  Please mail to him.  I believe I've **
** edited the headers, but I'm not sure.    -- John               **

John, Please post the following note to the net's amiga sig.

I am Amiga 1000 owner who would like to use the company upgrade offer 
to purchase a new 2000 or 2500.  I think I would like to "get into" 
3D CAD, 3D graphics with shading, maybe some animation, and video editing.

Would I be better off buying an AMIGA 2500 with a 16 Mhz processor, 
or should I buy an AMIGA 2000 and install GVP's A3000 28 Mhz 68030
accelerator board.  The money is approximately the same, about $2,000 plus
the old 1000. Either way, I plan to buy about 4 MB of RAM and
at least a 40 MB hard disk.  I plan to run DigiPaint 3 and Gold Disks'
Design 3D.

If anyone knows of a magazine article with bench mark tests, please 
let me know.

I am a fan of UNIX but I do not see an advantage in loading AMIX on 
the new Amiga for the applications above. If there is a good reason
for running UNIX for the purposes of graphics work, please inform me.
Could I, for example, start DigiPaint rendering or Ray Tracing in 
background?  If so, could I not do this with AMIGA DOS since it is also
a multitasker.  I love UNIX, but I am afraid of loading down my PC with
unneeded overhead.

Ray Kellogg    att!ocpfcad!rvk

"Better dead than DOS'd";"OS/2 : UNIX sold one piece at a time"