chrisw@gondor.actrix.co.nz (Chris Woodhouse) (05/27/90)
I am sending this message using Matt's UUCP version 1.03. Would appreciate comments on what improvements version 1.05 has. Also if someone could post 1.05 to comp.binaries.amiga for us folks "down under" it would be sincerely appreciated. Thanks -- Chris Woodhouse, chrisw@gondor.actrix.co.nz
kim@uts.amdahl.com (Kim DeVaughn) (05/27/90)
In article <00103.AA00103@gondor.actrix.co.nz>, chrisw@gondor.actrix.co.nz (Chris Woodhouse) writes: > > Would appreciate comments on what improvements version 1.05 has. I can't really say, as v1.051d is the 1st version that I've seriously tried getting up. In any case ... > Also if someone could post 1.05 to comp.binaries.amiga for > us folks "down under" it would be sincerely appreciated. Version 1.051d was sent to Tad awhile back. I dunno if he's planning to post it, as the distribution is pretty big, and v1.03 was posted not too long ago. Plus ... Matt just recently mentioned v1.06 would be along soon, so it's probably better if Tad can just wait a bit longer for it to arrive, and post it instead. /kim -- UUCP: kim@amdahl.amdahl.com or: {sun,decwrl,hplabs,pyramid,uunet,oliveb,ames}!amdahl!kim DDD: 408-746-8462 USPS: Amdahl Corp. M/S 249, 1250 E. Arques Av, Sunnyvale, CA 94086 BIX: kdevaughn GEnie: K.DEVAUGHN CIS: 76535,25
tadguy@abcfd01.larc.nasa.gov (Tad Guy) (05/30/90)
In article <726p024YaaUy01@amdahl.uts.amdahl.com> kim@uts.amdahl.com (Kim DeVaughn) writes: > Version 1.051d was sent to Tad awhile back. I dunno if he's > planning to post it, as the distribution is pretty big, and v1.03 > was posted not too long ago. The next UUCP posted to the Amiga code groups will be 1.06 or later. ...tad
dick@woodwrk.UUCP (Richard H. Wood, Garland, Texas) (05/31/90)
Chris Woodhouse, chrisw@gondor.actrix.co.nz writes: >I am sending this message using Matt's UUCP version 1.03. >Would appreciate comments on what improvements version 1.05 has. >Also if someone could post 1.05 to comp.binaries.amiga for >us folks "down under" it would be sincerely appreciated. > >Thanks The most noticeable improvement, to me at least, is a better News Reader/Poster in AmigaUUCP1.051D. But Matt's already mention 1.06D and an even newer Dnews (I can hardly wait). I'd suggest waiting for it. 1.03D was quite stable (as is 1.051D) and served me well for several months. I'd suspect the benefit vs. effort to upgrade to 1.051D at this point would be fairly low, assuming 1.06D is really just around the corner. -- d. ___________ _______ Dick Wood// / \ / \ |Become an | {texbell|texsun}!digi!woodwrk!dick| \\ // / \ / \| Organ |{egsner|texbell}!lerami!woodwrk!dick| Amiga\X/oodwork Bench | Donar| dwood@digi.lonestar.org|