[comp.sys.amiga] notepad

kwa1_ltd@ur-tut (Karl Wagenfuehr Ltd.) (05/07/88)

Distribution:




Can anyone give my *one* reason (note:  not *good* reason, just *reason*)
to not dispose of Notepad once and for all, and free up that disk space?
What good is it?  It has to be the worst slopped together kludge I have
ever seen.  Not only does it not know what it wants to be (simple notepad
vs more sophisticated editor), most of its "features" are so bug ridden
that it's not worth it to even try to use the damn thing.

I know; I just got done trying.  Call me stupid, but I figured, what the
heck, I'd play with the thing.  ...It should have a surgeon general's
warning on it.  I am so steamed right now!  First off, it is impossible
to work the "styles" right; it will apply the styles where ever it feels
like it.  I was trying to make one line be underlined and bold, and one
line be italic and bold.  It is impossible!  I'd make the first line
bold and underline, which would make the second line bold and underline,
too.  OK, so I go to the second line, and try to turn off underline;
doesn't work.  So I click plain text.  That works.  Then I choose
bold AND THE DAMN THING GIVES ME BOLD *AND* UNDERLINE!!  Then it wouldn't
print in anything other than draft mode.

I've had one experience with it before (about a year ago, so I had
forgotten just how brain dead this thing really is), and now I recall it
to have been just as infuriating.

How can Commodore put this piece of slop on the workbench?  It is just
plain not useable in its current form.  It is not a useful or useable
tool.  Yet it is in the workbench!!

The Amiga is a wonderful machine; but not everyone can jump straight in
and appreciate its wonderfulness right away.  Most of us have to go
through a few steps, like using the workbench.  So why is the workbench
so awful?  (The calculator is a joke; Say is hardly all it's cracked up
to be, (and we won't even *talk* about Notepad!) just to name a few.
Compared to something like a Mac, the Amiga does very poorly in
comparison.  The Workbench falls very far behind the mac in many respects,
although it's obvious it was designed to be "maclike"; the amiga is
a great machine, but amny people are turned away from it because it
doesn't show its greatness unless you look hard for it.  And that's a
shame.

So back to my original complaint:  either do things like Notepad well,
or don't do them at all.  The half-ass jobs that currently exist do
a great deal of harm to the Amiga's reputation.

Karl
['(]

kwa1_ltd@tut.cc.rochester.edu

Had this been an actual emergency, you would have been instructed to
put a bag over your head.  We now return you to your regularly scheduled
flame.

rmariani@watmum.waterloo.edu (Rico Mariani) (05/08/88)

In article (Karl Wagenfuehr Ltd.) writes:
>
>
>Can anyone give my *one* reason (note:  not *good* reason, just *reason*)
>to not dispose of Notepad once and for all, and free up that disk space?
>What good is it?  It has to be the worst slopped together kludge I have
>ever seen.  Not only does it not know what it wants to be (simple notepad
>vs more sophisticated editor), most of its "features" are so bug ridden
>that it's not worth it to even try to use the damn thing.

I agree 100%  I'd rather have the free disk space.  But I did find a use
for the program.  When I was converting Mac fonts to Amiga format, I needed
a fast way to look at fonts my converter was making to see if they were
getting all the right size/baseline/etc. parameters.  So I used... Notepad.

The best thing about the whole program is the "...Are you there fonts?" line.

But besides that it's a good for nothing waste of disk space and I'm sorry
I ever saw it in the first place and I wish someone would do something
better instead of putting up with that junk of the workbench disk that
everyone gets all of the time anyways.  Phew.

The Icon Editor and Calculator also blow the billowing big one but at
least they're functional.  There's a lot to be said for that.

Apologies to the author, it's always easy to cut software up after the fact.

	-Rico

hutch@net1.ucsd.edu (Jim Hutchison) (05/09/88)

kwa1_ltd@tut.cc.rochester.edu.UUCP (Karl Wagenfuehr Ltd.) writes:
[...]      > Not only does it not know what it wants to be (simple notepad
>vs more sophisticated editor), most of its "features" are so bug ridden
>that it's not worth it to even try to use the damn thing.
[...]
>So back to my original complaint:  either do things like Notepad well,
>or don't do them at all.  The half-ass jobs that currently exist do
>a great deal of harm to the Amiga's reputation.

Oh, man, major bummer.  Yeh, I guess *a* document would help.  Maybe there
was one and the cat ate it, anyway I no longer have it in my posession.

I use it all the time to write letters (USMail) to friends (I use ~10pt text),
and have only had a few problems understanding it.  Doing a double click to
grab areas, and then setting the style on them helps.  If it doesn't print
in anything but draft, you may want to take a look at your preferences.

Relax, have a beer, calm down, avoid possibly slanderous language.  The
kindly people from C-A are hanging out on the net, and doubtlessly more
than happy to help a fellow amiga-user in need.

#define flame on
Manx z, just took a header when I typed the F2 key, ate a term paper, ouch.
well atleast it didn't drop my dial-out.
#define flame off

    Jim Hutchison   		UUCP:	{dcdwest,ucbvax}!cs!net1!hutch
		    		ARPA:	Hutch@net1.ucsd.edu
Disclaimer:  I represent my own opinions.

josef@augs.ccs.imp.com (Josef Egloff) (08/16/90)

yes i know that silly notepad... :-). i've a simple question. what kind
of options have i with notepad? what i means is wich options can i set
in the tooltypes lines? i know there are several, but can't find any
infos about it.

thanks, josef
--
<  Josef Egloff            |         USENET:  josef@augs.ccs.imp.com   >
<  Pfaffnernweg 19         |         PATH:    impch!accsys!augs!josef  >
<  CH - 4852 Rothrist      |         CBMNET:  cbmswi!augs1!jegloff     >
<  Switzerland             |         AUGS:    as SYSOP (acc #1)        >

lshaw@walt.cc.utexas.edu (logan shaw) (08/19/90)

In article <josef.102002@augs.ccs.imp.com> josef@augs.ccs.imp.com (Josef Egloff) writes:
>yes i know that silly notepad... :-). i've a simple question. what kind
>of options have i with notepad? what i means is wich options can i set
>in the tooltypes lines? i know there are several, but can't find any
>infos about it.

From my experience with the notepad, your only reasonable option is to
delete every copy you have of it and never use it.  8^)  8^)  8^)  8^)

>thanks, josef
>--
><  Josef Egloff            |         USENET:  josef@augs.ccs.imp.com   >
><  Pfaffnernweg 19         |         PATH:    impch!accsys!augs!josef  >
><  CH - 4852 Rothrist      |         CBMNET:  cbmswi!augs1!jegloff     >
><  Switzerland             |         AUGS:    as SYSOP (acc #1)        >


============================================================================
"The beauty queen, clevely clad,                    Logan Shaw
 admires herself in a cigarette ad.                 lshaw@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu
 Will she admit that all was in vain                ========================
 when the face in her mirror cracks like a windowpane?"
              -Elim Hall, _Things_Break_