xanthian@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG (Kent Paul Dolan) (09/12/90)
thamilton@ch3.intel.com (Tony Hamilton, WF1-81, x48142) writes: >To whoever posted the idea that Intel chips just don't compare to Motorola's, >I can not agree more. They DON'T compare, because they follow two entirely >different principles. Motorola utilizes memory-mapping, while Intel uses >Isolated I/O. Each has various advantages and downfalls. When saying they >don't compare, I surely hope you infer that they are nothing alike, and not >that one is better than the other. The unfortunate thing is that most users >can only see the advantages of memory-mapping, while Intel chips are >appreciated most in the high end of the market. > >Defending Intel interests across the globe... > > Tony Hamilton > > THamilton@ch3.intel.com I LOVE IT! CHIP WARS! HERE WE GO AGAIN! WATCH OUT, ALT.SEX.PICTURES; COMP.SYS.AMIGA IS GOING FOR NUMBER ONE! A NEWSGROUP WITHOUT VOLUME, VOLUME, VOLUME GETS NO RESPECT! PUMP IT UP! (ANYBODY WANT TO MENTION WHY IBM-PC'S, ATARI'S, and MAC'S AREN'T FIT TO KISS THE AMIGA'S FEET, WHILE WE'RE AT IT? HOW ABOUT A FEW OS WARS, TOO? THAT BRAIN-DEAD MS-WINDOWS PACKAGE IS ABOUT DUE FOR ANOTHER CHEAP SHOT!) AND WE HAVE TO PUT UP WITH THIS FLACK FROM A SUSPECTED INTEL TOADY? THE COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE THAT BROKE THE C LANGUAGE STANDARD? STIR, STIR, STIR! ;-( <--- No, Gwendolyn, that _isn't_ a smiley face you see there. Kent, the man from xanth. <xanthian@Zorch.SF-Bay.ORG> <xanthian@well.sf.ca.us> -- Too chicken to sign myself BIFF, but you get the idea.