dvljhg@cs.umu.se (J|rgen Holmberg) (10/06/90)
I wrote that lharc was garbage in an earlier article. Lharc ( while not perfect ) is a fairly good program. Lhwarp on the other hand is about as far as you can get from pure code as you can get. Thank's Matt for pointing this out ( blushing all over ). I stand corrected. Jorgen
jma@beach.cis.ufl.edu (John 'Vlad' Adams) (10/06/90)
I still have to call you out. I use LHWarp 1.40, Zap, and Warp and all three work well. What problems are you having? -- John M. Adams --**-- Professional Student on the six-year plan! /// Internet: jma@beach.cis.ufl.edu -or- vladimir@maple.circa.ufl.edu /// "We'll always be together, together in electric dreams" Tangerine Dream \\V// Sysop of The Beachside. FIDOnet 1:3612/557. 904-492-2305 (Florida) \X/
dvljhg@cs.umu.se (J|rgen Holmberg) (10/07/90)
In article <24744@uflorida.cis.ufl.EDU> jma@beach.cis.ufl.edu (John 'Vlad' Adams) writes: >I still have to call you out. I use LHWarp 1.40, Zap, and Warp >and all three work well. What problems are you having? > Warp and zap works ok. Lhwarp is out in about 20 versions, I have ~15 of those and source for most of them. Since there are several versions of different versions including a trojan horse you can never be sure to use a well-working version. If there was only one or two people releasing new versions we would not have a problem but because of bogus/bad versions I am no longer using lhwarp. If your version works fine then use it. But I will use warp and zap until I find that lhwarp is reliable. Jorgen