bbs00244@uafcseg.uucp (Viet Ho) (09/26/90)
You CBM guys have done a wonderful job putting together 2.0's look. However, I still have a gripe about the way the windows are displayed in interlaced mode. Why is it that the vertical border/slider bars are fatter then the horizontal ones? How many A3000 users are going to have their WB screen in 640X200 lo-res mode??? Take a look at SoftWood Logic's (sp? the people who did PenPal) Electronic Thesaurus (ET) user interface. The window's imagery and fonts adjusts to the resolution specified. BTW, I love the NeXtStep gadgets on that one. Hope they don't into get trouble. -Viet Viet.Ho@samba.acs.unc.edu
peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva) (10/07/90)
In article <5311@uafhp.uark.edu> bbs00244@uafcseg.uucp (Viet Ho) writes: > How many A3000 users are going to > have their WB screen in 640X200 lo-res > mode??? Me! (I can't stand flicker and I can't afford a multisync monitor on top of the A3000) -- Peter da Silva. `-_-' <peter@sugar.hackercorp.com>.