manes@vger.nsu.edu (10/11/90)
Thanks Dan for pointing out something to me in email. Folks I made a speculation that I certainly can not stand by. I said that I did not believe that Commodore was going to support 2.0 on the Amiga 500, I said it in such a way that it appeared that I had some inside source. I have heard it several times but from lots of people. What I meant to say in the original post is that Commodore has not announced a 2.0 upgrade for the 500. I beg forgiveness.... -mark= manes@vger.nsu.edu
BAXTER_A@wehi.dn.mu.oz (10/12/90)
In article <43.27132af6@vger.nsu.edu>, manes@vger.nsu.edu writes: > Thanks Dan for pointing out something to me in email. > > Folks I made a speculation that I certainly can not stand by. > > I said that I did not believe that Commodore was going to support 2.0 > on the Amiga 500, I said it in such a way that it appeared that I had > some inside source. I have heard it several times but from lots of > people. > > What I meant to say in the original post is that Commodore has not > announced a 2.0 upgrade for the 500. > Wrong. They have anounced it. What they haven't anounced is _WHEN_. Regards Alan
manes@vger.nsu.edu (10/15/90)
In article <14151@wehi.dn.mu.oz>, BAXTER_A@wehi.dn.mu.oz writes: > In article <43.27132af6@vger.nsu.edu>, manes@vger.nsu.edu writes: >> Thanks Dan for pointing out something to me in email. >> > > Wrong. They have anounced it. What they haven't anounced is _WHEN_. > > Regards Alan Perhaps you would like to point out where the announcement came from and where I can get a copy? Strange that it has not *appeared* on my desk. I work for an Amiga dealer. -mark= manes@vger.nsu.edu