jcheng%neptune@CALSTATELA.EDU (Action Jackson) (12/16/90)
Hey did the new comp.sys.amiga.xxxx reorganizations just got passed? Seems I've gotten comp.sys.amiga.graphics (yay!), comp.sys.amiga.unix, comp.sys.amiga.announce already, but only 1 post in comp.sys.amiga.graphics. JacksonC (jcheng@neptune.calstatela.edu)
bjornmu@idt.unit.no (Bj|rn P. Munch) (12/17/90)
In article <9012151755.AA29275@neptune.calstatela.edu>, jcheng%neptune@CALSTATELA.EDU (Action Jackson) writes: |> Hey did the new comp.sys.amiga.xxxx reorganizations just got passed? Seems I've gotten comp.sys.amiga.graphics (yay!), comp.sys.amiga.unix, comp.sys.amiga.announce already, but only 1 post in comp.sys.amiga.graphics. |> They haven't passed (yet). Those groups were forgeries and should be ignored. Even better, they should be rmgrouped, as the News admin did here. BTW, comp.sys.amiga.unix is not even being voted upon now. ----- Bj|rn P. Munch | Div. of Comp. Science & Telematics, bjornmu@idt.unit.no | Norwegian Institute of Technology (NTH), PhD Student | Trondheim, Norway (some filler words here) | You can finger me @jod.idt.unit.no