[net.general] Usenet topology suboptimal

jbn@wdl1.UUCP (John B. Nagle) (02/25/84)

    Given the fact that long distance rates for US interstate calls are
such that the longest domestic interstate call costs less than three times
the rate of the shortest one, the average path length in this network is
much too long.  No path within the continental US should contain
more than three toll calls.  The total long distance bills for the net
are probably about twice what they would be if the topology were optimal.
I suggest that every site that dials faraway sites should undertake to
dial at least one site in each region defined by the first digit of the
zip coder, and that the dialed site should be one willing to dial
other sites in the same zip code block.  This measure alone should 
reduce everyone's charges.

rpw3@fortune.UUCP (02/26/84)

#R:wdl1:-17000:fortune:14500021:000:839
fortune!rpw3    Feb 25 21:25:00 1984

Look again at the phone charges listed in the front of your phone book.
For inTERstate calls over about 200 miles, rates are nearly flat across the
entire continental US ("contiguous 48"). We should indeed be optimizing number
of hops, but NOT particularly distance (outside of the "local calling area").
The inTRAstate rates are not much lower.

Late-night/weekend rates for each minute after the first from Palo Alto to:

	Berkeley, CA		$0.08
	Sacramento, CA		$0.14
	Reno, NV		$0.16
	Santa Barbara, CA	$0.18
	San Diego, CA		$0.18
	Denver, CO		$0.18
	Chicago, IL		$0.18
	Dallas,TX		$0.18
	Portland, ME		$0.20
	New York, NY		$0.20
	Atlanta, GA		$0.20
	Miami, FL		$0.20

Rob Warnock

UUCP:	{sri-unix,amd70,hpda,harpo,ihnp4,allegra}!fortune!rpw3
DDD:	(415)595-8444
USPS:	Fortune Systems Corp, 101 Twin Dolphins Drive, Redwood City, CA 94065