clemon@lemsys.UUCP (Craig Lemon) (01/08/91)
I though of this after I read my last batch of articles and don't have the original post to Follow-up to so I posted a new message... Why does everyone insist on 1.44 MB floppies. We're slipping into the IBM rut again people! Just because IBM decided to make their high density disks 720k*2 doesn't mean we have to! Why not 1.6 MB 2*880k? Why not 2MB - the full capacity of the HD disks. Why is it necessary to make the HD storage 2x the DD storage? Hardware capable of read/writing 2MB disks will easily be able to read IBM 1.44MB disks if the need arose. -- Craig Lemon - Kitchener, Ontario. Amiga B2000/10--2400 bps--AmigaUUCP 1.03D clemon@lemsys.UUCP or lemsys!clemon@xenitec.on.ca | lsuc!xenitec!lemsys!clemon@cs.toronto.edu | Choose your path. ....!{uunet}!watmath!xenitec!lemsys!clemon |