[comp.sys.ibm.pc] Microsoft customer "support", why it is.

del@pilchuck.UUCP (02/09/87)

This explanation has been posted before, guess it's my turn. I saw
someone from Microsoft post something similar to this once a long time
ago, I guess they have given up trying to reason with people.

Microsoft does not have the best customer support in the world, but it
is at least reasonable. It is unreasonable for you to expect them to
support MS-DOS! MS-DOS is an OEM product only, Microsoft does not sell
it (retail). PC-DOS is only MS-DOS with IBM PC drivers in it, OEM'ed to IBM.

Whoever the OEM that purchases the MS-DOS is expected to provide their
own support for it. Or they could probably pay Microsoft to provide
support, but I suppose they would rather pay less money and not get the
added service, why should they? If it doesn't increase their revenue more
than the cost of the support, it is wasted money.

I have no doubt that it is a real pain for Microsoft to have all these
people running around pissed off because MS doesn't support "their"
product. In actuality, you should be pissed off at the OEM that is the
"sponsor" of your particular version of MS-DOS. I actually had one guy,
that was so ignorant that he didn't know PC-DOS and MS-DOS were one and
the same, tell me he would never buy another product from Microsoft because
they don't support their customers, and HE bought his DOS from IBM because
theirs was better, had fewer bugs, and IBM supported their customers (!?!).

I don't work for Microsoft, don't particularly like them, and have no
association with them that is not absolutely necessary. But I support
free enterprise and their right to run their business in a manner that
will make a fair profit. And I respect them for doing an exceedingly good
job at the latter.

-- 
del (Erik Lindberg) 
uw-beaver!tikal!pilchuck!del

grandi@noao.UUCP (02/10/87)

In article <599@pilchuck.Data-IO.COM> del@pilchuck.UUCP (Erik Lindberg) writes:
>
>Microsoft does not have the best customer support in the world, but it
>is at least reasonable. It is unreasonable for you to expect them to
>support MS-DOS! MS-DOS is an OEM product only, Microsoft does not sell
>it (retail). PC-DOS is only MS-DOS with IBM PC drivers in it, OEM'ed to IBM.
>
When I bought my "generic" PC clone a few months back, the version of
MS-DOS I bought was a RETAIL release from Microsoft.  It is packaged with
GW-Basic and (as noted on the release disk) is intended "For Personal
Computers Compatible with IBM(R) Personal Computers."  Also, I've seen this
release listed in the ads by Jade in Byte Magazine.

Since Microsoft has released a clone PC-DOS to run on clone PCs, why
shouldn't they provide support?  (Well, since they don't help you much
when you buy Microsoft Assembler or C, I don't think they will start
now!).
-- 
Steve Grandi, National Optical Astronomy Observatories, Tucson, AZ, 602-325-9228
UUCP: {arizona,decvax,hao,ihnp4,seismo}!noao!grandi   Internet: grandi@noao.arpa
SPAN/HEPNET: 5356::GRANDI or DRACO::GRANDI

jantypas@hope.UUCP (02/10/87)

> 
> Microsoft does not have the best customer support in the world, but it
> is at least reasonable. It is unreasonable for you to expect them to
> support MS-DOS! MS-DOS is an OEM product only, Microsoft does not sell
> it (retail). PC-DOS is only MS-DOS with IBM PC drivers in it, OEM'ed to IBM.
> 

And I suppose this excuses them for the acts they do?  They can be rude and
downright insulting.  Try talking to some Xenix customers .  Even IF
Microsoft doesn't sell the product directly, they should be considering
what their dealers do.  SCO is their only dealer and they are also rude
and insulting at times.  (That's why I went with Microport.  They may have
bugs, but I know at least they try to fix them.)

michael@orcisi.UUCP (02/10/87)

One of the problems is that Microsoft allows their name to be attached
or otherwise connected to an OEM product.  If you are a supplier to an
OEM and you don't want the OEM's customers banging on your door,
you should prevent the OEM from using on your name.

On the otherhand, can you imagine what it would be like if every OEM
had a different name for MS-DOS?

zemon@felix.UUCP (02/17/87)

Just for the record, I bought my MS-DOS from Zenith (when I
bought my Z151).  It came with a phone number which is
answered by knowledgeable, courteous people who have always
answered my questions promptly.

There are some advantages to buying a name brand computer
instead of the Acme PClone with no support.  And as long as
I'm on the subject, here is my horror story for the day:

A friend called me up and asked me to installed the Acme
PClone that he bought.  Configuration?  The sales guy told
him he had a CPU, keyboard, 30Mb hard disk, monitor, and
MS-DOS.  "Some assembly required," of course!

What he didn't have was the mounting hardware for the hard
disk, manuals for MS-DOS, or even instructions for which
way to hook up the ribbon cables between the hard disk and
the controller (which, fortunately, was configured properly
'cuz there aren't any instructions for that either).

When I finally got it all running, the first thing I made
him do was buy a legal copy of PC-DOS so he would have a
full compliment of the transient programs and the
documentation to go with them.  Now I don't have to answer
questions like "How do I format a floppy disk?"
-- 
	-- Art Zemon
	   FileNet Corporation
	   Costa Mesa, California
	   ...! {decvax, ihnp4, ucbvax} !trwrb!felix!zemon