dalegass@dalcs.UUCP (03/31/87)
---------------------------------------------------------- During the discussion on TSR's a while back someone had mentioned that Microsoft would be putting together guidelines for people to follow in order to put a halt to TSR interference. The writer said that they were supposed to be ready in Nov '86 and that it was already late. I am currently writing a TSR and wish to be in compliance with the guidlines. Does anyone know if they have completed this document and where I can get it. While I'm at it, does anyone have a 'default echo off' patch for command.com in PC-DOS 3.2 Please ? (Note: PC-DOS) As always anyone else who wants this, email me and I will post if there is sufficient interest or email otherwise. -Jeff Scrutton uucp: stars!moon::scrutton@dalcs.uucp -----------------------------------------------------------------
dalegass@dalcs.UUCP (04/03/87)
Sorry to keep reposting this, but the return address on the previous postings seemed to be faulty. I've seen records in mail purgatory to the effect that the responses almost made it, but died locally before the last hop. Please send reponses to dalegass@dalcs.uucp instead. ---------------------------------------------------------- During the discussion on TSR's a while back someone had mentioned that Microsoft would be putting together guidelines for people to follow in order to put a halt to TSR interference. The writer said that they were supposed to be ready in Nov '86 and that it was already late. I am currently writing a TSR and wish to be in compliance with the guidlines. Does anyone know if they have completed this document and where I can get it. While I'm at it, does anyone have a 'default echo off' patch for command.com in PC-DOS 3.2 Please ? (Note: PC-DOS) As always anyone else who wants this, email me and I will post if there is sufficient interest or email otherwise. -Jeff Scrutton c/o dalegass@dalcs.uucp -----------------------------------------------------------------