micky@osu-eddie.UUCP (07/29/87)
From: Mayank Choudhary <micky> Hi! Once again, the mail network has done its thing. Our site did not receive part 3/6 of Micro Emacs source files, and so i have about 180K of code which is useless. Now if somebody be kind enough to tell me if the source files posted at .binaries are the same as the EMACSSRC38I.ARC as stored at SIMTEL20, i'll go ahead and FTP the lot. Cheers Micky micky@ohio-state.arpa
jjc@sdiris1.UUCP (Jim J. Carter) (07/30/87)
in article <3873@osu-eddie.UUCP>, micky@osu-eddie.UUCP says: > Once again, the mail network has done its thing. Our site did not receive > part 3/6 of Micro Emacs source files, and so i have about 180K of code which is > useless. Now if somebody be kind enough to tell me if the source files > posted at .binaries are the same as the EMACSSRC38I.ARC as stored at SIMTEL20, > i'll go ahead and FTP the lot. This happened to us to in San Diego,CA Could someone just post this part ?? We don't have FTP capabilities, so either e-mail or re-post please. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- UUCP: ...!hp-sdd!crash!sdiris1!jim | Jim Carter or: ...!sdcsvax!jack!man!sdiris1!jim | Control Data Corporation (CIM)
rich@ivory.SanDiego.NCR.COM (Rich Kaul x3365) (07/30/87)
In article <3873@osu-eddie.UUCP> micky@osu-eddie.UUCP writes: >... >Once again, the mail network has done its thing. Our site did not receive >part 3/6 of Micro Emacs source files, and so i have about 180K of code which is >useless. >... We also did not receive part 3/6. Could someone who got a copy send it to me? Thanks in advance. --- rich Rich Kaul ...!ucbvax!sdcsvax!ncr-sd!ivory!rich NCR Corporation - Advanced Development, San Diego
dalegass@dalcsug.UUCP (Dale Gass) (07/30/87)
In article <3873@osu-eddie.UUCP> micky@osu-eddie.UUCP writes: >Once again, the mail network has done its thing. Our site did not receive >part 3/6 of Micro Emacs source files, and so i have about 180K of code which is >useless. This happened to us, too. Maybe the extent of this problem warrants a repost of this part. I'd ask to get it mailed, but I usually get a bunch of responses, and get in trouble for mailing costs. Sigh... -dalegass@dalcsug.uucp
mawilson@violet.berkeley.edu (Mike Wilson) (07/31/87)
While we are on the subject of missing postings, where is part 2 of the 3d plotting routine? I could really make some immediate use of something like this (by which I DO NOT mean to criticize Mr. Alberty (sp?) at Northcoast, who I think has done a good job!!). Mike Wilson
rod@cpocd2.UUCP (Rod Rebello) (07/31/87)
>> Once again, the mail network has done its thing. Our site did not receive >> part 3/6 of Micro Emacs source files, and so i have about 180K of code which is >> useless. > >This happened to us to in San Diego,CA Could someone just post this part ?? >We don't have FTP capabilities, so either e-mail or re-post please. We are also missing part 3 - did the original postings ever really have it? Anyway, I agree - can someone please post it (or re-post)? Thanks.
bobmon@iucs.UUCP (condition that I not be identified) (07/31/87)
In article <3873@osu-eddie.UUCP> micky@osu-eddie.UUCP writes: > >Once again, the mail network has done its thing. Our site did not receive >part 3/6 of Micro Emacs source files, and so i have about 180K of code which is >useless. Now if somebody be kind enough to tell me if the source files >posted at .binaries are the same as the EMACSSRC38I.ARC as stored at SIMTEL20, >i'll go ahead and FTP the lot. > >Cheers >Micky I just took a look at it, and what was recently posted is version 3.8L. I don't see any drastic differences over v3.8i, at least not once I applied various patches that other people posted. Getting TurboC to compile it took enough hacking that I'm not gonna go through it all again -- not when v3.9 has been promised for Real Soon Now. v3.8i is working fine for me.
rhubbs@watdcsu.UUCP (07/31/87)
In article <3873@osu-eddie.UUCP> micky@osu-eddie.UUCP writes: >From: Mayank Choudhary <micky> > >Once again, the mail network has done its thing. Our site did not receive >part 3/6 of Micro Emacs source files, and so i have about 180K of code which is >useless. Now if somebody be kind enough to tell me if the source files >posted at .binaries are the same as the EMACSSRC38I.ARC as stored at SIMTEL20, >i'll go ahead and FTP the lot. >micky@ohio-state.arpa Yes I am having the same problem. Only mine is worse as I can't just FTP anything as up here we have no arpa-net and not FTP. would some kind soul like to mail my the missing part 3. I know of a least a dozen other people that are also looking for it, so I can mail it to them from here. Thanks in advance. ________________________________________________________________________________Canada, land of ice and snow. Where the apra-net lines dont go. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
coulter@hpclisp.HP.COM (Michael Coulter) (07/31/87)
After a delay of about a week, part three just showed up in comp.binaries.ibm.pc. -- Michael Coulter ...ucbvax!hpda (rctster
jmg@dolphy.UUCP (Jeffrey Greenberg) (08/01/87)
> > Our site did not receive part 3/6 of Micro Emacs source. > >This happened to us to in San Diego,CA > > We are also missing part 3 - did the original postings ever really have > it? Anyway, I agree - can someone please post it (or re-post)? > Arizona We in New York also did not receive part 3... Please repost.
zu@ethz.UUCP (Urs Zurbuchen) (08/03/87)
In article <4534@jade.BERKELEY.EDU> mawilson@violet.berkeley.edu (Mike Wilson) writes: >While we are on the subject of missing postings, where is part 2 >of the 3d plotting routine? It seems, part 2 of the 3d plotting routines wasn't received here, too. Is there a friendly soul out there who can tell me where to get it from? >... (by which I DO NOT mean to criticize Mr. >Alberty (sp?) at Northcoast, who I think has done a good job!!). Same applies here. Since about a month or so, many postings consisting of more than one article (mostly sources, of course), have one of there parts suppressed. This is valid at least for this European site. Among these postings are: - MicroEmacs Ver 3.8 l already mentioned by other poeple - MicroEmacs Ver 3.8 i now obsolete, but 6 parts missing - new fgrep, part 2 - right hand man (rhm), part 3 - 3d plot routines see above I'm pretty sure there are some others but they don't come to my mind. What goes on here? Is someone suppressing posted sources. As you see in the list above, there is more than only one newsgroup affected. ...urs UUCP: ...seismo!mcvax!cernvax!ethz!zu