aiv@euraiv1.UUCP (Eelco van Asperen) (08/06/87)
I just read Philippe Kahn's article on Sidekick Plus in Byte (July); has anyone on the net seen this beast running yet ? It *looks* nice; it enables you to write TSR's without having to write your own OS to work around DOS and gives you a lot of library routines to display windows etc. AND we would at last have a way to make all those TSR's work together rather than against each other, if it is accepted a standard. What I am interested in is how much RAM will it eat without any applications installed (ie. the Sidekick Plus kernel only) , the size with a small application (fe. a calculator) etc. Also, what will it cost me (a) to get the development environment and (b) to distribute my own applications ? Is the license as "no-nonsense" as Borland usually has ("use it as a book", "no runtime license-fees") ? Is it available now or are we in for the usual "Real Soon Now" ? Have any software companies announced their conformance to this new "standard" ? Eelco van Asperen. ----------------------------------------+-------------------------------------- Erasmus University Rotterdam |uucp:mcvax!{eurifb,olnl1}!euraiv1!evas Fac. of Economics,Computer Science Dept.|earn:asperen@hroeur5 PO.box 1738 / 3000 DR Rotterdam | T H E N E T H E R L A N D S |(this space intentionally left blank) ----------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
Isaac_K_Rabinovitch@cup.portal.com (08/13/87)
The most interesting thing about Kahn's Sidekick Plus article: he doesn't call the Plus kernel a "TSR kernel" he calls it an "Operating System". In other words, he's claiming to have done the OS work that Microsoft should have done in the first place.