gandalf@bradley.UUCP (11/20/87)
>In a recent posting to the net Joe Brady talks of problems with using >Microsoft codeview on a 256K .exe file. In the article he states that >codeview needs 140k and DOS needs 40k. [intervening text deleted] >Watch out! CODEVIEW 2.0 is out on the market. Just saw it in MASM 5.0! Watch out is right...the newest version of Codeview (released with MSC 5.0) adds 80K to the .exe size of the version I had been using, a similar amount to the runtime required load size...Half the things I used to Codeview all the time no longer have enough space and using the "Expanded Memory" option to store the symbol table didn't make any difference! Thanks a lot, Microsoft. PS...Not only does new Codeview not load in my old files, old Codeview is unfortunately also not happy with MSC 5.0 codeview debugging options and LINK 3.61. Bob Greenwald ...ihnp4!bradley!gandalf