schuster@dasys1.UUCP (Michael Schuster) (01/27/88)
If this subject has been covered recently, my apologies:
The MS-DOS 3.30 manual describes the use of the DRIVPARM specifier as with
DOS 3.2 (and as many know, this also worked - undocumented - with PC-DOS 3.2x).
I have been unable to get DOS to recignize a DRIVPARM entry in CONFIG.SYS
("Invalid Entry in CONFIG.SYS file"). Which is wrong in this regard - the
manual, or DOS? If the latter, is a patch coming?
--
l\ /l' _ Mike Schuster {sun!hoptoad,cmcl2!phri}!dasys1!schuster
l \/ lll/(_ Big Electric Cat schuster@dasys1.UUCP
l lll\(_ New York, NY USA DELPHI,GEnie:MSCHUSTER CIS:70346,1745 leefi@microsoft.UUCP (Lee Fisher) (01/28/88)
In article <2731@dasys1.UUCP>, schuster@dasys1.UUCP (Michael Schuster) writes: > > The MS-DOS 3.30 manual describes the use of the DRIVPARM specifier as > with DOS 3.2. I have been unable to get DOS to recignize a DRIVPARM > entry in CONFIG.SYS ("Invalid Entry in CONFIG.SYS file"). Which is wrong > in this regard - the manual, or DOS? If the latter, is a patch coming? > > Mike Schuster, {sun!hoptoad,cmcl2!phri}!dasys1!schuster It's a bug in DOS. A patch is coming for MS-DOS v3.30. Call us at 206-882-8089 and tell the person on the other end that you're having this problem. If you are using an OEM version of DOS, you should contact them and find out about the availability of it from them. -Lee ________ 01001100 Lee Fisher, Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA. 01000101 {uw-beaver,decvax,decwrl,trsvax,sun,attunix,uunet}!microsof!leefi 01000101 leefi@microsof.uucp 01000110 leefi@microsof.beaver.washington.edu 01001001 disclaimer: My opinions are my own, not those of my employer.