[comp.sys.ibm.pc] MSC vs TurboC vs ???

eric@hpcvlx.HP.COM (Eric Gullerud) (03/12/88)

I have recently joined the PC world, coming over from the UN*X camp.
I have MicroSoft C and have been favorably impressed with the degree
of compatability between the UN*X and MSC libraries (although I have
yet to do the kind of programming that would really test the compatabilty).

I am also aware that there are other C compiliers out there, most notably
the Turbo C compiler(s).  My question is this:  Has anyone come up with a
list of guidelines/restrictions/recommendations for writing C programs that
are portable between different C compilers and libraries?  What functions
or constructs should I avoid using that might work with MSC but not other
C compilers?  Has anyone (or magazine) published such a comparison recently?

				Eric Gullerud
				Hewlett Packard
				...!hplabs!hp-pcd!eric

P.S. (I expect some remark from Russ Nelson, you former HP employee you...)

daveg@hpcvlx.HP.COM (Dave Guggisberg) (03/12/88)

Well as this is going to start the flame throwers again (I can
already hear the Turbo-ers lighting up to get the MS-ers and 
visa versa), and as I just sit down the isle from Eric, I thought
it would be appropriate to start the flames and 50 responses
to this again!  Yes, folks we're going to have to go through
this again.

Flame on

Next time please look at past notes and walk down the isle
and ask any of the rest of us.  It would save you time and
the net a lot of grief.  I really don't want go through 
another round of Borland's great/sucks -- MS is great/sucks.

Flame off

My first flame in over two years.  Don't I feel better!

Daveg@hp-pcd