mb@camcon.uucp (Mike Bell) (07/12/88)
From article <1275@csuna.UUCP>, by abcscnuk@csuna.UUCP (Naoto Kimura): > The problem I am having is that when I use the routines (listings are > included in the article) that I have written, I get the wrong baud > rate (see code in AUXIO.INC). I am hoping to get this code > _COM_4800 = $C0; (* 110- ---- *) > _COM_9600 = $D0; (* 111- ---- *) ^^ ^^^^ Actually $D0 is 11010000. Like the Turbo-Pascal Compiler, I only report the first error... More seriously, I appreciate your problem, but *please don't use USENET to debug programs* Although the occasional challenge is nice, if everybody started doing this it would be chaos... (we all have enough bugs of our own to contend with:-) Your question about whether there is a better way to solve the problem is perfectly valid, however: but I don't know the answer. -- -- Mike Bell -- <mb@camcon.uucp>,<mb@camcon.co.uk> or even <...!ukc!camcon!mb>
txr98@wash08.UUCP (Timothy Reed) (07/15/88)
In article <1647@titan.camcon.uucp> mb@camcon.uucp (Mike Bell) writes: >From article <1275@csuna.UUCP>, by abcscnuk@csuna.UUCP (Naoto Kimura): >> The problem I am having is that when I use the routines (listings are > > *please don't use USENET to debug programs* > >-- Mike Bell -- <mb@camcon.uucp>,<mb@camcon.co.uk> or even <...!ukc!camcon!mb> programming questions are just as valid as lawyer jokes or alt.flames or the other junk that usenet carries. God forbid - programming questions on a net - would this jeopardize bandwidth for rec.gdead or comp.soc.women? Programmer information-exchange is one reason this net exists, bub. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "/Timothy/Reed/American/Chemical/Society" 32 lines, 1038 characters