mac3n@babbage.acc.virginia.edu (Alex Colvin) (10/25/88)
In article <1334@micomvax.UUCP>, ray@micomvax.UUCP (Ray Dunn) writes: > > [GSARC] ....are we to resist this just because it's > >incompatible - even though it is a significant step forward in > >compression efficiency? > To answer the question - yes, unless you want to perpetuate the state of > non-standardisation. If we weren't so tied up in backward compatibility, we wouldn't be reading news about these @#!& i4004 clones.