[comp.sys.ibm.pc] Exploding clock cards

greg@amdahl.uts.amdahl.com (Greg Bullough) (12/02/88)

The other night, as I was walking by the room where my XT sat running,
I heard a bang, like the sound a TV makes when its high voltage arcs.
In fact I assumed the monitor had arced, due to dust or whatever.

Next time I brought the system up, I noticed that the SEFCO clock wasn't
working. I bought a new battery, and when I went to install it, found that
the old battery had exploded and burned, with enough force to bend the
battery clip back to a 45-degree angle. There were chunck of battery
innards all over the inside of the inside of the PC. This was no quiet
self-destruction.

Investigation showed that the SEFCO clock card had +5 volts across the
lithium battery terminals! Now it's hard to determine the circuit from
the PC board, but there doesn't seem to be much that protects the
battery from the supply voltage...

Interesting, indeed.

Greg

berger@clio.las.uiuc.edu (12/07/88)

There should have been a diode preventing the voltage from being
applied to the battery.  Was the diode shorted, or missing alto-
gether?

			Mike Berger
			Department of Statistics 
			University of Illinois 

			berger@clio.las.uiuc.edu
			{convex | pur-ee}!uiucuxc!clio!berger

greg@amdahl.uts.amdahl.com (Greg Bullough) (12/08/88)

In article <16800395@clio> berger@clio.las.uiuc.edu writes:
>
>There should have been a diode preventing the voltage from being
>applied to the battery.  Was the diode shorted, or missing alto-
>gether?
>
Well, there's more to the story, now. The card was replaced by a
very concerned dealer. I plugged in the new card, pulled the battery,
put a VOM across the clip, and turned on the computer. VOILA!
+5 VOLTS! Great design, huh? I cannot find a blocking diode, so I
assume it was left out of the design.

Can anybody correct me if I'm wrong. It IS a no-no to put a positive
over-voltage across a lithium battery, isn't it??

Greg

pnelson@antares.UUCP (Phil Nelson) (12/08/88)

In article <dcKUudf=Im1010ncJtw@amdahl.uts.amdahl.com| greg@amdahl.uts.amdahl.com (Greg Bullough) writes:

..cut some stuff..

|Well, there's more to the story, now. The card was replaced by a
|very concerned dealer. I plugged in the new card, pulled the battery,
|put a VOM across the clip, and turned on the computer. VOILA!
|+5 VOLTS! Great design, huh? I cannot find a blocking diode, so I
|assume it was left out of the design.
|
|Can anybody correct me if I'm wrong. It IS a no-no to put a positive
|over-voltage across a lithium battery, isn't it??
|
|Greg

In a word, yes. One thing though, if you are measuring with a good DVM, you
might want to re-try with a load, say 10K ohms. A good DVM will read voltage
supplied by minute (and inconsequential, in this case) leakage current.


-- 
Phil Nelson at (but not speaking for)
Tymnet, McDonnell Douglas Network Systems Company      POTS:408-922-7508
UUCP:{ames|pyramid}oliveb!tymix!antares!pnelson   LRV: Component Station

skl@van-bc.UUCP (Samuel Lam) (12/09/88)

In article <dcKUudf=Im1010ncJtw@amdahl.uts.amdahl.com>,
 greg@amdahl.uts.amdahl.com (Greg Bullough) wrote:
 > The card was replaced by a
 > very concerned dealer. I plugged in the new card, pulled the battery,
 > put a VOM across the clip, and turned on the computer. VOILA!
 > +5 VOLTS! Great design, huh? I cannot find a blocking diode, so I
 > assume it was left out of the design.
 > 
 > Can anybody correct me if I'm wrong. It IS a no-no to put a positive
 > over-voltage across a lithium battery, isn't it??

Perhaps that particular card was designed to use NiCad battery
(rechargable) instead of lithium battery (non-rechargable).
The +5 volts that is used to recharge the NiCad while the computer
is on will probably eventually blow up a lithium which found its
way there.

-- 
Samuel Lam     {alberta,watmath,uw-beaver,cs.ubc.ca}!ubc-cs!van-bc!skl

mbe@dde.uucp (Martin Berg) (12/15/88)

In article <dcKUudf=Im1010ncJtw@amdahl.uts.amdahl.com>, greg@amdahl.uts.amdahl.com (Greg Bullough) writes:
> ..
> Well, there's more to the story, now. The card was replaced by a
> very concerned dealer. I plugged in the new card, pulled the battery,
> put a VOM across the clip, and turned on the computer. VOILA!
> +5 VOLTS! Great design, huh? I cannot find a blocking diode, so I
> assume it was left out of the design.
> 
> Can anybody correct me if I'm wrong. It IS a no-no to put a positive
> over-voltage across a lithium battery, isn't it??

What input impedance does your VOM have ?

Could it be that it is so big that even a large resistor (say > 100 Kohm)
from the +5 V to the battery could give this result ?

If this is the case, the current flowing from to supply to the battery
wouldn't hurt the battery.

By big input impedance I mean something like 5-10 Mohm.
-- 
mbe@dde.dk                  |  "The answer is 42"
or                          |  A. Douglas
..mcvax!enea!dkuug!dde!mbe  |

greg@uts.amdahl.com (Greg Bullough) (12/17/88)

In article <119@mother.dde.uucp> mbe@dde.uucp (Martin Berg) writes:
>In article <dcKUudf=Im1010ncJtw@amdahl.uts.amdahl.com>, greg@amdahl.uts.amdahl.com (Greg Bullough) writes:
>> ..
>> Well, there's more to the story, now. The card was replaced by a
>> very concerned dealer. I plugged in the new card, pulled the battery,
>> put a VOM across the clip, and turned on the computer. VOILA!
>> +5 VOLTS! Great design, huh? I cannot find a blocking diode, so I
>> assume it was left out of the design.
>> 
>> Can anybody correct me if I'm wrong. It IS a no-no to put a positive
>> over-voltage across a lithium battery, isn't it??
>
>What input impedance does your VOM have ?
>
I used an 100,000-ohm/volt FET VOM for this debacle.

>Could it be that it is so big that even a large resistor (say > 100 Kohm)
>from the +5 V to the battery could give this result ?

There was a resistor from the battery to the supply. 100 puny ohms. That
reminds me... I should check the total resistance from the B+ line
on the pin-out of the card to the battery positive. I don't THINK
there are other resistors in the circuit, but I may be mistaken.
In any case, a little diode has provided the proper kind of resistance
and settled the issue entirely. The potential on the battery never
rises above it's rating, now. Nothing like a bit of dining-room-table
engineering.

>If this is the case, the current flowing from to supply to the battery
>wouldn't hurt the battery.

Ah, yes, but the key was that the current (or something else) hurt
one battery VERY badly. And it takes a lot more heat than is ambient
in that section of my PC to cause a spontaneous explosion of a lithium
battery.

Greg