[net.general] Discussions of removal of net.general

evan@petfe.UUCP (Evan Marcus) (08/05/85)

It's been my impression that the general quantity of net.general has more
than doubled since this discussion came about.  Personally I don't think
it's wothwhile, but if a full-blown discussion is to begin, perhaps a
net.general temporary subgroup might be in order??

If it ain't broke, why fix it?

--Evan Marcus
-- 
{ucbvax|decvax}!vax135!petsd!petfe!evan
                         ...!pedsgd!pedsga!evan

What do you want?  Wicker?