[comp.sys.ibm.pc] remember, guys, HD disks are rated for 2M >> 1.44M

hundt@paul.rutgers.edu (Thomas M. Hundt) (02/09/89)

Just thought I'd point this out; there are a lot of people using the
720k diskettes in 1.44 mode with apparent success; but there are a few
who insist on HD's.  The one seems like underkill, the other over. :-)

Question:  Does anybody use 2M disks at 2M density?  How?

-Tom
-- 
RRRRRR    Thomas M. Hundt (aka hundt@occlusal.rutgers.edu)
 RR  RR   Gradual Student --- Electrical & Computer Engineering
 RR  RR   Rutgers University         201/932-5843(Lab)
 RRRRR    272 Hamilton St. #96       201/247-6723(H)
 RR  RR   New Brunswick, NJ  08901
RRR  RRR  Famous last words: "The virus ate it."

johne@hpvcfs1.HP.COM (John Eaton) (02/11/89)

<<<<<
< Just thought I'd point this out; there are a lot of people using the
< 720k diskettes in 1.44 mode with apparent success;
Thats not something you want to try with data you really care about. While
a drive might be able to format and use a 720K disk as a 1.44M disk it
will probably be the first to go as the drive ages or the temperature
changes. 

BTW:  1.44M = 1.44 *(1024)*(1000). Talk about mixed units of measure.

< Question:  Does anybody use 2M disks at 2M density?  How?

1.44M is 2M density. The difference is formated vs. unformated capacity.



John Eaton
!hpvcfs1!johne