gen-vote@phri.UUCP (delete net.general) (02/15/86)
I hereby propose that net.general be deleted. Before you leap to your soapbox, hear me out. Then, MAIL your vote to gen-vote@phri. Since I anticipate a *lot* of mail on this one, please include either the string "delete net.general" or "keep net.general" in the subject; the count will be done by a shell script. If you have something you actually want me to read, also include the string "discussion". According to the "Rules for posting to net.general" which Gene Spafford (gatech!spaf) posts every month, net.general is only for items that *everybody* on the net should read. I submit that there really aren't any articles that meet that criterion; for the few that do, net.news.adm or net.announce is probably more appropriate. I've put this on net.general only because if I don't, people will complain, "How come you didn't ask us, the readers of net.general, what *we* thought?" Personally, I don't get too worked up over the errant postings on net.general. What bothers me more is the massive traffic on net.followup that gets generated after every one. We all know about the dinette set, and the earring, and the speaker system. We don't need 25 flames about each one. The resources wasted shipping those flames around far exceed what it cost to send the original article. The particular article that prompted me to post this proposal was about 50 lines long. The original was about 5; right there we're 10:1 in flames. So, send me your vote. Please, do *not* post your vote to the entire network. If you have something to add to the discussion, mail it to gen-vote@phri and I will post periodic summaries (on net.news.group). If you have something to add that absolutely, positively must be posted, at least post it to net.news.group where it belongs. -- Roy Smith, {allegra,philabs}!phri!roy System Administrator, Public Health Research Institute 455 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016