abcscnge@csuna.csun.edu (Scott "The Pseudo-Hacker" Neugroschl) (05/24/89)
In article <235@imspw6.UUCP> bob@imspw6.UUCP (Bob Burch) writes: >Religious-war fans will get a kick out of Garry Ray's article on page >49 of the May 22 issue of PC-WEEK. The latest polls seem to show customers >significantly more satisfied with Borlands programming products, INCLUDING >the Turbo-C 2.0 package vs MS-C 5 comparison. Interesting stuff. Now if they only could get a Windows SDK for TC 2.0 -- sigh :-) Anyone out there know if QC 2.0 will compile for windows (given the SDK)? -- Scott "The Pseudo-Hacker" Neugroschl UUCP: ...!sm.unisys.com!csun!csuna.csun.edu!abcscnge -- Beat me, Whip me, make me code in Ada -- Disclaimers? We don't need no stinking disclaimers!!!
rogerson@PEDEV.Columbia.NCR.COM (Dale Rogerson) (05/24/89)
In article <2002@csuna.csun.edu> abcscnge@csuna.csun.edu (Scott Neugroschl) writes: >Now if they only could get a Windows SDK for TC 2.0 -- sigh :-) > >Anyone out there know if QC 2.0 will compile for windows (given the SDK)? >-- >Scott "The Pseudo-Hacker" Neugroschl QC 2.0 is suppose to support compilation of Windows programs if you have the SDK. However, people seem to be having problems with this. This is currently being discussed on GEnie. I will check my capture files and see what has been said. ( It may require that you have the libraries from C 5.1, which would be really stupid. ) -----Dale Rogerson-----
pajerek@isctsse.UUCP (Don Pajerek) (05/25/89)
In article <2002@csuna.csun.edu> abcscnge@csuna.csun.edu (Scott Neugroschl) writes: >Anyone out there know if QC 2.0 will compile for windows (given the SDK)? Only the Microsoft and Lattice compilers will produce object modules that are acceptable for Windows applications. True, you need the Windows SDK to get the include files and libraries, but that's not ALL you need. >Scott "The Pseudo-Hacker" Neugroschl Don Pajerek
rogerson@PEDEV.Columbia.NCR.COM (Dale Rogerson) (05/26/89)
In article <242@isctsse.UUCP> pajerek@isctsse.UUCP (Donald Pajerek) writes: >In article <2002@csuna.csun.edu> abcscnge@csuna.csun.edu (Scott Neugroschl) writes: >>Anyone out there know if QC 2.0 will compile for windows (given the SDK)? > >Only the Microsoft and Lattice compilers will produce object modules >that are acceptable for Windows applications. True, you need the Windows >SDK to get the include files and libraries, but that's not ALL you need. > >>Scott "The Pseudo-Hacker" Neugroschl The QC 2.0 compiler supports Windows compilation. However, there seems to be bugs in the libraries which are causing some problems with this. I will check on GEnie and see what the progress is. However, you are not just limited to Microsoft and Lattice compilers, you can also use the following: Actor (oops, like smalltalk) Glockenspiel C++/Common_view ( OS/2 also ) C_talk/Views (requires MSC) Stony Brook Modula II For OS/2 programers Logitech Modula II Topspeed Modula II -----Dale Rogerson-----