[comp.sys.ibm.pc] Wanted: C Compiler

gjp@sei.cmu.edu (George Pandelios) (06/09/89)

[B

>!/* Written  5:09 pm  Jun  6, 1989 by phil@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu in m.cs.uiuc.edu:comp.sys.ibm.pc */
>!What's wrong with a C compiler than knows if an array is larger than a 64K
>!segment that it just simply has to generate code that can calculate the
>!correct segment address and displacement each time it needs to access an
>!array location?
>!
>!It's not THAT hard to do, but sure, it will slow down the program.  What would
>!be nice is a compiler than CAN do this if the array is declared obviously
>!larger than 64K.  Also, pointer arithmetic may need this code, and this
>!should be specifiable as a compile option as well.
>!
>!So, can any 8086 C compiler DO THAT?
>!
>!--Phil howard--  <phil@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>
>!/* End of text from m.cs.uiuc.edu:comp.sys.ibm.pc */
>
>
>    Both the Lattice C and the Microsoft C (and doubtlessly many others)
>can do (most) of this.  
>
> [much text deleted]
>
>	William Brown
>	brown@cs.uiuc.edu
>	University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Phil:

I don't program much in C, but you may want to look at PC Magazine, Vol 7, 
No. 15 (September 13, 1988).  There is an entire article devoted to C 
compiler comparison.  I believe the magazine Computer Language has an annual 
C issue (in February).  I don't know that you will find what you need, but 
here are two places to start.

Good Luck,

George

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
  George J. Pandelios				ArpaNet:  gjp@sei.cmu.edu
  Software Engineering Institute		usenet:	  sei!gjp
  4500 Fifth Avenue				Voice:	  (412) 268-7186
  Pittsburgh, PA 15221
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Disclaimer:  These opinions are my own and do not reflect those of the
	     Software Engineering Institute, its sponsors, customers, 
	     clients, affiliates, or Carnegie-Mellon University.  In fact,
	     any resemblence of these opinions to any individual, living
	     or dead, fictional or real, is purely coincidental.  So there.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=