[comp.sys.ibm.pc] Help with CloneBuilding

jburnes@pnet02.gryphon.com (Jim Burnes) (09/07/89)

Anyone:

I'm thinking of constructing my own clone from the board level up
so that I can be sure of what's inside my computer (and getting a
good deal at the same time). Anyone know of the possible pitfalls
of this approach?  I have been scouring the pages of Computer
Shopper and with various reviews I beginning to get an idea of
what a powerful and economical system might consist of.  Some of
these parts I'm still not so sure of, so if you have any comments
regarding this configuration I'd be much obliged.

           Part                          Comments
           -----------                   ------------------
           Half Height Tower             Any reason why not?
           72 Meg 18ms Miniscribe 3085?  Any other MFM half heigts
           4.6 Meg Ram                   cheap source of 1m simms?
           ACER 386/20 MotherBd AT Jr.   Anyone familiar with this?
           Northgate Keyboard
           Perstor ARRL Controller       Doubles Storage
           Zenith Flat Screen VGA        Maybe Samsung 800X600
           Undecided VGA Card
           Undecided I/O Card
           Fujitsu 3.5&5.25Floppies      Heard Theyre very quiet
           MSDOS                         Can you still get 3.3?
           XENIX 386 Devel System        For Cross Devel Work
           QNX                           Any opinions?

Im especially curious about using a half height tower and if the
the ARRL Perstor Controller is reliable.  Also I really want the
clarity of the Zenith Monitor but would prefer one that works
at 800X600 like the Samsung and other Super VGA Monitors.
How about mice and printers.  I think the Seikosha printers are
a pretty good value.

Thanks very much!

Jim Burnes


UUCP: {ames!elroy, <routing site>}!gryphon!pnet02!jburnes
INET: jburnes@pnet02.gryphon.com

davidsen@crdos1.crd.ge.COM (Wm E Davidsen Jr) (09/07/89)

In article <19568@gryphon.COM>, jburnes@pnet02.gryphon.com (Jim Burnes) writes:
|             Part                          Comments
|             -----------                   ------------------
|             Half Height Tower             Any reason why not?
  Unless you have a good reason for a small case, a large case *tends*
to cool better, and won't run out of room as fast. I'm looking for a
tower with 3 HH and 2 FH bays now, you *will* run out of room. Get a big
power supply, 250-275w for future use and reliability.
|             72 Meg 18ms Miniscribe 3085?  Any other MFM half heigts
  Unless you need the space again, why not a cheap half height. The
Seagate 4144 (or 4096 if you feel lucky) run with the ARRL controller.
|             4.6 Meg Ram                   cheap source of 1m simms?
|             ACER 386/20 MotherBd AT Jr.   Anyone familiar with this?
  Look for another motherboard which allows use of DIP instead. There
are a few which take up to 4MB DIP *and* 4 MB SIMM.
|             Northgate Keyboard
  The best!
|             Perstor ARRL Controller       Doubles Storage
  While I have used one of these, a few words of caution. First, the
cheap one (hard disk only) won't run UNIX, you need the high bucks
version (about $300-375 street price). Second, the one I had didn't have
hardware track buffering, which makes it slow under UNIX. I went to the
WD1006VSR2 RLL controller (after using Adaptek) and it's much faster.
For the price you could go RLL and buy a bigger disk.
|             Zenith Flat Screen VGA        Maybe Samsung 800X600
  Spend the bucks for the Zenith or NEC 4D.
|             Undecided VGA Card
  There are some good cheap ones. I use the Hedaka and with extra memory
it goes 1024x768 and 640x480x256. It also runs all the standard modes
I've tried, including some of the ones you get on a IBM VGA by diddling
the registers.
|             Undecided I/O Card
|             Fujitsu 3.5&5.25Floppies      Heard Theyre very quiet
|             MSDOS                         Can you still get 3.3?
  You can and should, but read on...
|             XENIX 386 Devel System        For Cross Devel Work
|             QNX                           Any opinions?
  For cross development you could get Xenix, vpix, and the development
set. Or you could wait until SCO starts shipping the development set for
SCO UNIX and get OS/2 support, too. I will guess the street price for
all of that will be about $1200-1400, but haven't seen the dealer prices
on it yet. You can use someone else's UNIX, like INteractive, but they
don't offer the cross compilation, and the last version of their
compiler I tried was less ANSI compliant than SCO (neither is perfect,
just diferent bugs).
 ________________________________________________________________
|                                                                |
|  Going on vacation... be back 9/18 or 9/25 weather permitting  |
|                  Replies will be delayed.                      |
|________________________________________________________________|
-- 
bill davidsen	(davidsen@crdos1.crd.GE.COM -or- uunet!crdgw1!crdos1!davidsen)
"The world is filled with fools. They blindly follow their so-called
'reason' in the face of the church and common sense. Any fool can see
that the world is flat!" - anon

JLI@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu (09/08/89)

I have built a few units for myself and friends, and each had very
different configurations based on availability of parts, prices, and
performance requirement. Almost all parts I got were through mail
order places (mostly advertised on Computer Shopper).  The following
is my opinion on some parts.

           Part                          Comments
           -----------                   ------------------
           Half Height Tower             If it is large enough to hold
                                         all drives you want to put in,
                                         I don't see why not.
                                         Some small Tower cases looks
                                         very nice, but the power supplies
                                         in them are not regular sized.
                                         I have some problem with them
                                         (higher failure rate than the
                                          regular ones have, and you have
                                          to go to the original manufacture
                                          to get replacement).

           72 Meg 18ms Miniscribe 3085?  You can also try Mitsubishi drives
                                         or Seagate 4096 or 4144R (full-hight).
                                         Seagate drives are cheaper.

           4.6 Meg Ram                   I haven't tried SIMMs myself yet.
                                         I usually use 1M chips.  No
                                         comments here.

           ACER 386/20 MotherBd AT Jr.   I am not familiar with this board.
                                         No comments here.

           Northgate Keyboard            No comments here.

           Perstor ARRL Controller       This controller is 2:1 controller.
                                         If you are using 18 ms drive,  you
                                         better use a 1:1 controller.  
                                         According to some reviews, this ARLL
                                         controller has some problems (it has
                                         been discussed ealier in this news
                                         group).  I have been using ST-4096
                                         with WD1006V-SR2 controller (RLL,
                                         1:1 interleave) to obtain 122MB.
                                         It has been used for more than 6
                                         months without any problems.

           Zenith Flat Screen VGA        This monitor has nice display but
                                         it can not reach 800X600 resolution.
                                         
           Undecided VGA Card            There are reviews on various PC
                                         publications.  I haven't tried many
                                         of them.  I have been using VRAM
                                         VGA since it first came out.  It is
                                         expensive but has high performance.
                                         Some people reported it has some
                                         kind of compatibility problem with
                                         certain mother boards, but it works
                                         fine with the systems I built.

           Undecided I/O Card            No comments here.

           Fujitsu 3.5&5.25Floppies      No comments here.  I use SONY and
                                         TEAC drives a lot.

           MSDOS                         No comments here.  You still can
                                         get MS-DOS 3.3.  I am mainly use
                                         MS-DOS 4.01.

           XENIX 386 Devel System        No comments here, but I have heard
                                         it is good.

           QNX                           No comments here. A friend of mine
                                         told me that the SCO XENIX is better
                                         than QNX. He is a XENIX user of course.

mms00786@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (09/08/89)

Another thing you might consider is that:
  a) All the component boards (especially VGA and Disk controller) might 
     have default setups that conflict (eg, shadow ram vs VGA BIOS extension
     vs Controller BIOS extension). If you end up with such a conflict, they
     are incredibly hard to find.
  b) The vendors you buy the component boards from will almost always point
     the finger at the "other" board manufacturer.

So, for about $200 more you get the same higher quality, plus a guarantee
that all the components will work together, which, in my limited experience,
is more than worth it. 

Milan
mms00786@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu
.
 

root@nstar.UUCP (Larry Snyder) (09/09/89)

In article <10892@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu>, JLI@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu writes:
>            QNX                           No comments here. A friend of mine
>                                          told me that the SCO XENIX is better
>                                          than QNX. He is a XENIX user of course.

I would agree with your friend on this.  QNX is not standard - and 
even with the POSIX file system due out in 6 months - QNX will still
not run Xenix or Unix binaries.  QNX will also not support multiple
DOS tasks per machine.

-- 
Larry Snyder                                              SCO Xenix 2.3.2 '386
uucp: iuvax!ndcheg!ndmath!nstar!larry                Computone Intelliport AT8
The Northern Star Usenet Distribution Site                    HST / PEP / V.22
Notre Dame, Indiana USA                            Home of the fighting Irish!