[net.movies] apology for graphics in STII message

wm (06/25/82)

This letter is in response to Tom Duff's message.

I apologize for implying that Jim Blinn worked on STII.  Taken out of
context, I can see how someone would think that I was saying that.  My
message was a hastily drafted flame that was entered in response to
someone else's message in net.movies that implied that Lucasfilm was
almost completely responsible for the current state of the art in
computer graphics (I think one of their statements was something like
"... using techniques developed at Lucasfilm").  You are correct, Ed
Catmull did pioneer texture mapping (but again, this work was not done
at Lucasfilm).  I mentioned Blinn because of the outstanding work he
has done in the area, but I did not mean to imply that he had anything
to do with STII.  My message was about who had developed certain
algorithms, not who had done the work on STII.  I have nothing but
respect for the people at Lucas and IL&M, and their fine work.  Thank
you very much for setting the record straight about who had done what
on the movie.

I should have known better, though.  In his review of Siggraph '81
in Creative Computing, Ted Nelson credited our lab for some images
produced elsewhere, including one by Loren Carpenter.  Where he got
his information, I don't know (certainly not from us), but after
trying to straighten that out, you would think that I would think
long and hard before I go and credit someone for some work. I did
show the message to one other graphics person here before sending
it out, and he didn't catch the Blinn/Catmull switch either. *sigh*

			Wm Leler
			decvax!duke!unc!wm

p.s. Does this mean I can't get a job with you after all?