[comp.sys.ibm.pc] Word processor for Toshiba

BCHS1B@jane.uh.edu (10/13/89)

In article <1380@cbnewsj.ATT.COM>, drv@cbnewsj.ATT.COM (dennis.r.vogel) writes:
> Now that Ka Chin Wong has found his word processor and I have learned
> a lot about the differences between Word and WP, I have a followup
> question.  Without rehashing the Word/WP comparison, which of the
> two would be better on a Toshiba T1000 laptop without a mouse and
> without a hard disk or the RAM card?
> 
> Dennis R. Vogel
> AT&T Bell Laboratories
> Lincroft, NJ

Both require a lot of disk space. I would certainly prefer to use WP without
a mouse than I would Word. One thing you might not know, is that WP corp
sells a program called Wordperfect Executive which contains a toned down
version of Wordperfect, some fancy stuff was left out, which is designed
to fit on a single 3.5 floppy and use in a portable computer. In addition
it has a mini database and spreadsheet included. I would suggest you
check this out for use on your Toshiba.

Mike Benedik
University of Houston

pault@hp-ptp.HP.COM (Paul_Taira) (10/21/89)

/ hp-ptp:comp.sys.ibm.pc / ajk@mace.cc.purdue.edu (Jeff Boerio) /  2:03 am  Oct  6, 1989 /
kwong@polyslo.CalPoly.EDU (Ka Chin Wong) writes:


>   I am considering MS Word 5.0 and WordPerfect 5.0.  I can get Word
>for $89 and WordPerfect for $135.  I know WordPerfect is well known, but
>Word is more affordable.

  I have been using MS Word for ~4 years and it is great.  I have done several
  long (50+ page) documents and it is great.  The formatting is quite simple
  especially with the style sheets.  But I would recommend that you try both
  before buying.  They are both excellent products.  

  PS. IMO, the interface to laser printers :) is better with MS Word.