kempf@tci.bell-atl.com (Cory Kempf) (01/11/90)
Just to clear the air, last time I checked, the mac could run: MacOS: (system/finder/multifinder) Unix: at least three different unixes: AUX, MacIdris, one with a card (can't remeber what it was called though), with strong rumors of two more comming out "real soon now" (MacMach by Mt Xinu, Minix) AppleDOS: IIinAMac (software) MS-DOS: several different ways, one of which doesn't require hardware (SoftPC) And (if anybody is really interested, I have heard rumors that there is a CPM emulator out for the mac. Additionally, the mac can be running (subject to memory limits) any combination of MacOS, Unix, AppleDos (I think, never actually used it), and MS-DOS, ALL AT THE SAME TIME (though only the gods know why you would want to). +C -- Cory Kempf Technology Concepts phone: (508) 443-7311 x341 uucp: {anywhere}!uunet!tci!kempf, kempf@tci.bell-atl.com DISCLAIMER: TCI is not responsible for my opinions, nor I for theirs
pabres13@pc.usl.edu (Joubert John V.) (01/11/90)
Excuse me, but I need to put in my two cents. I thik I can show just
how silly this whole "mine can do this & yours can't ... Nyahh Nyahh Nyahh"
affair really is.
The Atari ST computer can quite easily run BOTH Macinotsh and IBM,
and quite well !
The Spectre 128 runs 128K rom applicationsfor the Macintosh very
reliably and very quickly(10-20% faster than a Mac can!).
The PC-Ditto II runs 8086 software for the PC very well also, does
a very stable Norton SI 3.0.
Each of these items costs onlyy $300 -- signifigantly less than most top of the
line alternate O/S's and/or emulators.
Keeping in mind the afore mentioned "Nyahh Nyahh" doctrine and following it
religously, I should chunk my 386-20 Clonish and go buy back that ST I sold
a year ago or so!
DON'T FLAME ME YET!!
I am NOT recommending anyone to go out and buy an Atari ST! I used to have
one, and I am extremely glad I no longer have it! I now own a 386 PC, and
am quite happy with it, I have paid for it easily with "pick up" work for
local companies, etc. and truly enjoy it.
I would also like another computer! Yes, a Mac SE/30 would be real nice
on another desk! Come time to write a paper for school, I could be the
"bear from hell" (Gary Larson).
I cast my vote for... about $10,000 worth of both PC & Macintosh, with a
laser printer that can handle both!
The NeXT thing I wish for is.....
--
John Joubert | /\ | /\ | _
Internet: pabres13@usl-pc.usl.edu | \|<>|>|> \|<>|>|><`|`|
GENIE: J.JOUBERT |--/|-------/|------------
| \/ \/
ksand@appleoz.oz.au (Kent Sandvik) (01/14/90)
kempf@tci.bell-atl.com (Cory Kempf) writes in article <545@tci.bell-atl.com>: Just to clear the air, last time I checked, the mac could run: MacOS: (system/finder/multifinder) Unix: at least three different unixes: AUX, MacIdris, one with a card (can't remeber what it was called though), with strong rumors of two more comming out "real soon now" (MacMach by Mt Xinu, Minix) OS/9 is also ported to the Macintosh platform. The beauty with OS/9, MacIdris and the MS-DOS Operating system emulations is that they run under MultiFinder in separate windows... So for instance if you want a MacOS base operating system with UNIX facilities, go for example for MacIdris, if you want a UNIX platform with capabilities to run Mac binaries, go for A/UX. /ksand -- Kent Sandvik, Network Ninja -- Apple Australia Developer Tech Support {uunet,mcvax,enea}!munnari!appleoz.oz!ksand, ksand@appleoz.oz.au (OR ksand@apple.com) AppleLink: AUSTAUX Disclaimer: "Opinions expressed are not Apple's opinions"