wade@nmtvax.UUCP (05/10/84)
Sure Rich, net.music is for all music lovers to speak
out, but do you have to speak out so much? Why don't you
post periodic messages telling us when you have another one
of your great writings of wit, and those of us who want to
be insulted and degraded by your great well of knowledge can
reply and have it mailed to them. Those of us who don't
want to be bothered by the garbage you spew forth (I know,
you are the one who knows all) won't have to bother with it.
Therefore, don't post your reply to me, mail it to me if
you have to reply, but don't burden the rest of us poor,
ignorant fools who you feel you have to educate.
Richard Wade
P.S. I would agree with most of your points if you weren't
such an asshole about the way you make them.dya@unc-c.UUCP (05/13/84)
References: nmtvax.320
Oh yeah ! And I assume that, because you can make such ad hominem arguments
about Rich Rosen; that this, indeed, makes you the final arbiter of matters
of taste.
I think that Rich Rosen was arguing against this kind of crap.
Could we move these UNWARRANTED stains to net.flame, please; and reserve
net.music for the discussion of music (which Rosen was also doing ?)
David "Not affiliated with Rich, but still Last of the Analog" Anthony
UUCP-Flame: > /dev/null
Other comments ( decvax,akgua,philabs ) mcnc!urp!dya