[comp.sys.ibm.pc] EISA Disk Controller from IBM

tim@vicom.com (Tim Richardson) (06/12/90)

Is anyone currently using the new ESIA bus interface disk controller
from IBM... the one which their literature claims supports over 16Mbytes
per second?  I'd like to correspond with anyone who is using it.
Pls reply directly to:

                      |  ames!vsi1!tim   tim@vicom.com
-- 

Tim Richardson
VP Engineering
(415) 498-3200

poffen@sj.ate.slb.com (Russ Poffenberger) (06/13/90)

In article <1990Jun12.152437.18467@vicom.com> tim@vicom.com (Tim Richardson) writes:
>
>Is anyone currently using the new ESIA bus interface disk controller
>from IBM... the one which their literature claims supports over 16Mbytes
>per second?  I'd like to correspond with anyone who is using it.
>Pls reply directly to:
>
 The problem here is that no disks are available that run that fast. The
fastest commercially available disks are dual headed IPI-2 drives that can
presently achieve 6Mb/s


Russ Poffenberger               DOMAIN: poffen@sj.ate.slb.com
Schlumberger Technologies       UUCP:   {uunet,decwrl,amdahl}!sjsca4!poffen
1601 Technology Drive		CIS:	72401,276
San Jose, Ca. 95110             (408)437-5254

neese@adaptex.UUCP (06/14/90)

>>Is anyone currently using the new ESIA bus interface disk controller
>>from IBM... the one which their literature claims supports over 16Mbytes
>>per second?  I'd like to correspond with anyone who is using it.
>>Pls reply directly to:
>>
> The problem here is that no disks are available that run that fast. The
>fastest commercially available disks are dual headed IPI-2 drives that can
>presently achieve 6Mb/s

Not that this answers the original posting, but....  This is quite correct.
I kind of chuckle at the folks who buy a 32Bit EISA SCSI adapter and think
they are going to get a big boost in performance.  It just isn't going to
happen until there are FAST (10MByte/sec) SCSI-2 drives.  Now if they
bought that EISA SCSI card and it can't support FAST SCSI-2, then they
really did get screwed.  Current SCSI technology can barely keep up with
streaming data at 2MByte/sec, much less 10Mbytes/sec.  At these speeds
(2MB/sec), a 16bit board can more than keep up.
For instance, our 154x board has the ability to move data across the AT
bus at up to 10MBytes/sec.  Even at the default speed of 5MByte/sec, the
board is laying around waiting for the drive.
Of course, it remains to be seen if the FAST SCSI-2 drives will be able to
stream at 10MBytes/sec or simply burst at that speed.  I suspect the latter
to be true.  They may only be able to stream at 5MBytes/sec.  Still slow
for a 32bit board which is capable of running at 32MBytes/sec.  But relatively
fast for a board that can only run at 10MBytes/sec.
The point being, the 16Bit boards still haven't been fully exploited, so if
you are the first on the block to have a 32Bit SCSI adapter, you will have
only gained the fact that you were first.  If that means a lot to you then
you win, but if performance was what you were looking for, then you didn't
gain much and spent a lot.

			Roy Neese
			Adaptec Senior SCSI Applications Engineer
			UUCP @  uunet!swbatl!texbell!
				  {cpe,merch,nominil}!adaptex!neese
				uunet!mlite!adaptex!neese