[comp.sys.ibm.pc] Ignorance, was Which is fastest 386/33 or 486/25 ?

phil@brahms.amd.com (Phil Ngai) (07/14/90)

In article <17200007@yoyodyne> koziol@yoyodyne.ncsa.uiuc.edu writes:
|
|One of the main reasons for the '486 being about twice as fast as the '386
|is because of the way the chips are clocked.  The '386 (and also the '030
|BTW) use a divide-by-two clock from the system clock to actually clock the 
|internals of the chip.  The '486 (and the '040) are syncronously tied to the
|system clock, i.e. they actually clock at 25Mhz at a system clock of 25Mhz
|as opposed to the '386 which is internally dropped to 12.5Mhz at a 25Mhz
|system clock.

Wrong, bozo. A 25 Mhz 386 actually gets 50 Mhz in and the 386 divides
it down to 25 Mhz.

Please do not post misinformation.

--
--
Phil Ngai, phil@amd.com		{uunet,decwrl,ucbvax}!amdcad!phil
PALASM 90: it's not the same old PALASM any more!