root@shawn.uucp (0000-Admin(0000)) (10/31/90)
Generally, I see multisync monitors advertised lately. The reasons I hear for using a multisync monitor is that it will work with many graphics cards at many resolutions. Presumably, on a fixed frequency monitor, the frequencies are simply set to a fixed value, and you use it with one graphics device. What is really wrong with that? If I buy graphics card XYZ, then what is wrong with getting a monitor that is less expensive and fixed frequency, and then setting it to that frequency? Is there some other issues that make fixed frequency monitors undesirable? Or are multisync monitors just easier to set up? What's the REAL difference between using a fixed or a multisync? Thanks in advance! Mark Jeghers