rog@rtech.UUCP (Roger Taranto) (02/19/88)
When I upgraded my machine from OS 3.5 to 3.51, the installation
instructions said not to use the 3.5 Development set. Since I wasn't
interested in paying any more money, I kept the 3.5 Development Set.
So, my questions are: what, if anything, will go wrong if I continue
to use the 3.5 Development Set with the 3.51 OS? Second, how much
is the upgrade to the 3.51 DS, and how difficult is it to get.
-Roger
{mtxinu,ptsfa,amdahl,sun}!rtech!rogpjh@mccc.UUCP (Peter J. Holsberg) (02/22/88)
In article <1730@rtech.UUCP> rog@rtech.UUCP (Roger Taranto) writes: | |When I upgraded my machine from OS 3.5 to 3.51, the installation |instructions said not to use the 3.5 Development set. Since I wasn't |interested in paying any more money, I kept the 3.5 Development Set. | |So, my questions are: what, if anything, will go wrong if I continue |to use the 3.5 Development Set with the 3.51 OS? Second, how much |is the upgrade to the 3.51 DS, and how difficult is it to get. | |-Roger |{mtxinu,ptsfa,amdahl,sun}!rtech!rog Can't answer the second question, Roger, but I've been using 3.5 development set on 3.51 machines for a couple of months. The only problem was loading the advanced editors--several of the 3.5 AE disks couldn't be read. -- Peter Holsberg UUCP: {rutgers!}princeton!mccc!pjh Technology Division CompuServe: 70240,334 Mercer College GEnie: PJHOLSBERG Trenton, NJ 08690 Voice: 1-609-586-4800