kevin@kosman.UUCP (Kevin O'Gorman) (07/12/88)
In article <1069@umbc3.UMD.EDU> alex@umbc3.UMD.EDU (Alex S. Crain) writes: ]In article <435@kosman.UUCP> kevin@kosman.UUCP (that's me!!!) writes: ]>I got 1.22 from acornc, and a shar from the unix-pc net that said it would ]>make for the 3b1. This was so far gone that I just ignored it. ]> ]>So I got the patches from acornc to bring it up to 1.24, and linked and ]>edited all the things that the INSTALL file suggested. I installed the ]>uuencoded cpp from the unix-pc net, and had another go. ] ] gcc-1.24 gave me segmentation faults, although it compiled ok. I'm ]going to get a fresh distribution and rebuild, but I suspect that 1.24 has ]problems. 1.23 definately had bugs, 1.24 was supposed to fix them all, but ]may have missed on or two. I can't get it to compile. What am I missing???? ] ] 1.22 is very stable, and you should use that if you can. 1.24 intrduces This was also impossible. The stuff that came through on unix-pc.whatever telling how to make it said DONT TOUCH -- but then left us without a config.h and so on -- that's what I mean by being so far gone (see above quote). So, does someone know how to make a stable release, anywhere from 1.22 to 1.24?? ]sdb support which doesn't work, and a few others. I don't exepect another real ]stable distribution till 1.26, given the current state of things. ] ]BTW: the obstack.h problems are due cpp defining __STDC__. You can't undefine ]it, but you can edit the #ifdef in obstack.h. All this does NOT give me warm fuzzy feelings. Anyone out there who can do better?