jperry@sri-unix.arpa.UUCP (05/28/87)
You're right, Doug. I'll 'fess up. I misscanned the code for strcpy() in K & R --- it really does agree with the Standard C Library version where the destination string is the first parameter (I guess since "t" follows "s" I assumed "s" to be the source string in K & R's example). Of course, this mistake, which has NOTHING to do with my general criticisms of C, gives you every right to launch ad hominems at me (I'm a C "illiterate" and I'm "morally wrong" for expressing my anti-C views). (sic) It's also quite ethical for you to question my ethics and then call for the termination of this discussion as "irrelevant" immediately AFTER your recent magnum opus. You claim that such advocacy as I express is "silly" when, in fact, your advocacy of C was far more heated (and SLANDEROUS) than my criticism. It's also more than a bit suspicious that the manager of INFO-APPLE, who also called for the termination of the discussion, ALSO WORKS ON THE BRL COMPUTER. Believe me, I have no intention of continuing this or any other discussion on INFO-APPLE. It's hard to fight hypocrisy, buddy-ism, and opportunistic leaping onto mistaken details when they actually have little to do with the thread of an argument. When these techniques are used to bully people into silence, it is intolerable. John Perry
gwyn@BRL.ARPA.UUCP (05/29/87)
You really ought to do something about your perceptions of people. Brint Cooper and I have had no discussions about INFO-APPLE or the language debate on it. The C programmers I know did not learn C so they could join a mystical closed club. And so forth.