[comp.sys.apple] DOS 3.3 on a hard disk

SEWALL@UCONNVM.BITNET (01/06/88)

In truth, the ProDOS operating system has numerous significant
advantages over DOS 3.3 (which is a marvel though if for no other
reason than the Woz is said to have written most of it <the original
Apple DOS> in an afternoon).  Problem: there's still a good deal of
really nice DOS 3.3 software that's never been ported to ProDOS (and
won't be in the case of stuff from companies that have gone Chapter
11 or otherwise vanished).

As I've mentioned before, I know a HUGE number of people who still
use Hayden's PIE Writer because it's files are mainframe compatible
(and to boot, it's very nearly a clone of IBM mainframe SCRIPT) and
it's a nice simple (quick -- all in RAM) general purpose editor (in
'T' or 'B' format).  It would be nicer (and less memory bound) in
ProDOS, but alas Hayden (and Spinnaker, which bought Hayden out)
can't be interested (or even bribed) to port PIE to ProDOS.

Have you ever tried Volkfiler (available for about $12 from A.P.P.L.E.)?
That's one of the all time best values for the $$$ I've ever bought
(won't run in ProDOS 8-(  ).  I'm still willing to allocate 400K of
my RamFactor for a DOS 3.3 partition (and in terms of use hours, I
still use DOS 3.3 more than ProDOS).  Seems to me I saw a program that's
supposed to permit a DOS 3.3 volume to exist as a "file" on a ProDOS
volume (and modify DOS 3.3 to recognize it) on a local BBS (I'll
check into that) -- ain't it amazin' what ol' Uncle DOS can be
modified to do?  Not too shabby for an obsolescent ol' slug.

---------------------
ARPA:   sewall%uconnvm.bitnet@cunyvm.cuny.edu       Murphy A. Sewall
BITNET: SEWALL@UCONNVM                          School of Business Admin.
UUCP:   ...ihnp4!psuvax1!UCONNVM.BITNET!SEWALL  University of Connecticut