[comp.sys.apple] IIgs Too Wimpy, Seeking Greener Pastures

cs2531bn@charon.unm.edu (Lazlo Nibble) (03/20/88)

> ...I'm thinking of getting an Amiga 2000 this summer... UNLESS, of course,
> this gs+ thing turns into a reality.  But Apple is FAST losing my interest
> (and many other peoples' I'm sure!)
>
> mcl9337@tamvenus.bitnet

Sounds familiar.  Most of the // people I know (four or five of us) are looking
into trashing the //s and gettting Amigas.  When I got my //e looong ago (five
years now!  Geez!) it was becuase it was the most hack-able machine out there,
and you could do the most fun stuff on it.  Unfortunately Apple has decided not
to keep going in that direction.  I didn't bother to upgrade to a IIgs because
the wimpy increase in processor speed didn't make it worthwhile -- when you can
get a 12MHz PC clone system (complete with 40M hard drive) or a rockin' little
Amiga 500 system, both for under $1500, what the hell's the point of spending
around $1000 for a new motherboard, monitor, and mouse?  Just so you can use
SuperHiRes (which is doomed to be nearly as slow as mundane HiRes, thanks to
the brain-damaged way they designed the graphics support for it)?  Ehhhh.  No
thanks.  The IIgs isn't really a new //, just an old II with a lot of bells and
whistles crammed into it.  With a faster processer and some more dedicated
hardware they could have done "old" // emulation in software and had a much
more powerful (and useful) machine in IIgs mode.

Barring something spectacular happening in the // department, my next machine
isn't going to be an Apple.  Which is kind of sad, because I've been a very
loud Apple supporter for a long time now.  Too bad they haven't seen fit to
stay competitive with what the other companies are offering.

Lately I've noticed a lot of other people who feel the same way I do.  I wonder
if Apple realises this?

Lazlo Nibble (cs2531bn@charon.unm.edu)

msicv01@ms3.UUCP (Jay G. Heiser) (03/24/88)

I have to agree that the //GS is too little too late.  I bought my //e
almost 5 years ago & was happy with it for years.  At the time, the IBM PC
and DOS 1.0 didn't offer much.  Over the years, I've purchased the 2nd
64k, a mouse, the enhancement, a RAM board, a 3.5" drive, and buckets
of software that I don't use any more.

Now I've got a Zenith-248 AT compatible at work with 1 Meg, 21 Meg hard
drive, and EGA.  I can run programs off of the hard drive faster than my
old //e can run smaller, less useful programs off of its RAM drive.  I've
got memory resident programs that allow me to cut & paste between
multiple applications, a solid PD VT100 emulator, etc. etc.

The best news is that I can find a similar system for myself for under $2000.
Like I said, MS-DOS 1.0 was nothing special, but version 3, with output
redirection, path names, and gobs of good & free (or cheap) utilities is a
pretty fair OS.

All I use my //e for now is word processing, a mail list (not updated for
over a year), and terminal emulation.  (Dollars & $ense crashed last April
15 and I don't have the heart to type in another year's work for nothing).
Since I don't have a heavy investment in software, I can't think of any
reason to buy a //GS.

Personally, I'm waiting for the 80386 machines to come down to the price of
the 80286 -- then the trusty old //e will be gracefully retired.



-- 
Jay Heiser                   UUCP: ..!umd5!vrdxhq!ms3!msicv01
                             ARPA: msicv01@hios-pent.arpa