[comp.sys.apple] Kermit Question and Re: DOS3.3 Vs. ProDOS

LMB7421@RITVAX.BITNET (04/18/88)

I've been using Kermit 3.82 now for about 1 hour, and have noticed some
problems....

1) the common VT-100 emulator bug of the 80th column (is occurring - it wasn't
   before - 3.81 seemed to do it on input & output, 3.82 only on output - I'm
   using EVE, and all my lines longer than 80 columns have an extra <CR> after
   them, although when I am typing the text doesn't wrap to the next line
except on the line directly above the window bottom)
2) Kermit 3.80 had a character substitution which was a RUB (checked cursor),
   which was wonderful as a wall on Larn (System V UNIX Larn)...now, when I
   play, I get nothing...no RUB, no funky character, nothing...this makes it
   hard to navigate the mazes, etc...please add this back in...:-)

On other Kermit questions...
   Could someone tell me a possible reason why C-Kermit on a AT&T 3b1 (sysV)
could not open a file while in server mode to Kermit-65?  I would put it in
Server mode, and SENDa file to it (this also applies to typing receive and
jumping back to the Apple and typing SEND file.)  I got a REMOTE MESSAGE:
Could Not Open File message on the screen...


Re:  What I like about DOS 3.3 and ProDOS...

Likes:  DOS 3.3 - MONICO (I like to be able to monitor my EXEC files, etc...)
                  filenames - I HATE 15 character limits and restricted chars
                  simplicity - could be understood in a few days, and worked on
                  size - DOS 3.3 fits in ANYTHING...
        ProDOS  - Universal accessability of ANY filetype
                  Hirarchical file system
                  Complete catalog info
Dislikes:DOS 3.3- speed (fixed by any number of take-offs)
                  Disk size limit
                  set filetype (only if you couldn't edit a sector)
                  unavailability of file info other than size
         ProDOS - speed (not yet fixed)
                  complexity (have to load this, that, and the other thing to
                    work with it, and can't find manuals to understand it all)
                  tendency to crash easily - ProDOS seems to wimp out quickly
                  Filename limitations
                  size - ProDOS with BASIC.SYSTEM installed is FAR too large for
                         my tastes

ProDOS 16 shows some promise, but only if they get it on the market soon...

Phoenix
Les Barstow
LMB7421@RITVAX.BITNET
..rutgers!rochester!ritcv!ultb!lmb7421.UUCP
(please do NOT send to my previously posted address of
..rutgers!rochester!kodak!gizzmo!lazlo!loki!phoenix.UUCP,
as the site has a name conflict and will be renamed soon)