TMPLee@DOCKMASTER.ARPA (05/11/88)
Everyone of course appreciates those who take the trouble to tune and improve kermit -- but I would think in the interests of lessening confusion only Ted Medin should be allowed to 'release' any versions that have an 'official' sounding name -- the one recently mentioned, for instance, should perhaps be known as 3.82-SEWALL, but definitely not 3.83. I'd also argue, but less strongly, that the ONLY versions of kermit that should be released in any mass way (e.g., through a LISTSERV mechanism) are those that are released through Columbia. TMPLee@Dockmaster.arpa