[net.movies] Star Trek III review

ajs@hpfcla.UUCP (06/02/84)

Just  got  back  from  the  first  showing  in town  of Star  Trek  III.
Consensus  is that the movie is better than the previous  one, and maybe
version I also.  Well paced, great special effects, reasonable  premise,
great  acting, new  directions  in the  storyline.  Picks up right where
STII left off.  Somewhat campy; Trekkies everywhere will love it.

Alan Silverstein

esmith@uok.UUCP (06/13/84)

#R:hpfcla:-1860000400:uok:5100020:000:531
uok!esmith    Jun 13 11:17:00 1984

Yeah, I'm glad to see someone besides me like STIII.  I thought the movie
was one of the best I have seen this year (go see GhostBusters).  Being
an avid Trekkie from way back, I can't wait for the next one.

/*FLAME ON*/
To all those that were so disappointed by STIII.

Obviously you didn't like Star Trek to begin with.  If you get tired of
discussing it here go over to net.startrek they would be happy to roast
you a bit.

/*FLAME OFF*/

                        Eric L. Smith

                        !Ctvax!uokvax!uok!esmith

bytebug@pertec.UUCP (roger long) (06/28/84)

> Just  got  back  from  the  first  showing  in town  of Star  Trek  III.
> Consensus  is that the movie is better than the previous  one, and maybe
> version I also.  Well paced, great special effects, reasonable  premise,
> great  acting, new  directions  in the  storyline.  Picks up right where
> STII left off.  Somewhat campy; Trekkies everywhere will love it.

Well, having just seen it last night, I'll comment that I liked it as well
as ST:II, though Karen thought ST:II was better.  

The only credit I'll give to ST:I is that it got the whole Star Trek 
craze rolling again (after all, the re-runs had gotten a bit old, and the
different stations around the country were chopping them up more and more
to put more commercials in).  Once the studio saw that it could make some
money with Star Trek movies, it appears that they spent some on a couple
of decent scripts (ST:II and ST:III) and decent special effects.  ST:I
was a bomb that no Trekkie could love.

dwhitney@uok.UUCP (07/03/84)

#R:pertec:-15800:uok:5100032:000:508
uok!dwhitney    Jul  3 12:34:00 1984


Hold the phone!!  Who says ST1 was a film "no Trekkie could love"?
I loved it!! and I've been a full-fledeged card-carrying Trekkie for the
last 12 years! I'll admit it wasnt as good as the last two films, but, hey,
I DID think it was a good film in its own right..(better than NO return at
ALL, right?  It sure made the studio more careful about how the following
stories were written, didn't it??)

An affirmed TREK 1 fan, (and TREK 2 and Trek 3 and TRek nnn)
!ctvax!uokvax!uok!dwhitney
David Whitney
/ex