lee@TIS.COM (Theodore Lee) (11/24/88)
After having obtained a beta copy of kermit 3.85 it only seemed appropriate to express my and our -- the backwater Apple II folks, of any ilk -- appreciation to Ted Medin for the work he's done on kermit-65. The more you look at it, the more of a tour de force it really is -- umpty jillion commo cards, four different machines, three different emulations, and two protocols. (I haven't tried xmodem, but trust it works.) and TWO operating systems (is there anyone around still using DOS 3.3?) absolutely amazing ...
medin@cod.NOSC.MIL (Ted Medin) (11/30/88)
Well kermit-65 is where it is today because of the original developers and a lot of people on the net who have helped along the way. So for all of us i say thank you. Now if i could just figure out what the problem is with those new //c's :-(.
ugfelong@cs.Buffalo.EDU (Edward Felong) (11/30/88)
In article <1310@cod.NOSC.MIL> medin@cod.nosc.mil.UUCP (Ted Medin) writes: > > Well kermit-65 is where it is today because of the original developers >and a lot of people on the net who have helped along the way. >So for all of us i say thank you. > > > Now if i could just figure out what the problem is with those new //c's >:-(. I was just about to ask this newsgroup why kermit-65 doesn't work on my new system. Version 3.84 worked fine on my old Apple //c. I traded that in for an Apple IIc Plus and it just hangs or jumps into the monitor when you 'connect'. I did get version 2.61a to run on the Apple IIc Plus. Although I can't trick it into 1200 baud like I could on the Apple//c by booting it after connected at the higher baud rate. Transfering files at 300 baud is a bit painful. I just thought this might help. Good luck. Ed ugfelong @ sunybcs.BITNET ugfelong @ cs.Buffalo.EDU ..!{boulder,decvax,rutgers}!sunybcs!ugfelong