stowekeller@pro-carolina.cts.com (Stowe Keller) (05/01/89)
Murph,
I could have sworn that the message that did reach you was sent via:
crash!nosc!rutgers!uconnvm.bitnet!sewall , but when I tried to reply
via that path to the msg you sent me, it bounced back. This is getting
really frustrating!
Stowe
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stowe Keller Author of ProDOS8 LIST utility
CompuServe: 71540,725 GEnie: SKELLER BIX: stowekeller
UUCP: [ sdcsvax nosc ] !crash!pro-carolina!stowekeller
ARPA: crash!pro-carolina!stowekeller@nosc.mil
INET: stowekeller@pro-carolina.cts.comSEWALL@UCONNVM.BITNET (Murph Sewall) (05/02/89)
> I could have sworn that the message that did reach you was sent via: > crash!nosc!rutgers!uconnvm.bitnet!sewall , but when I tried to >reply >via that path to the msg you sent me, it bounced back. This is getting >really frustrating! Ain't gateways wonderful(?)! 8-( That IS a valid path; although you don't say where the bounce came from, I wouldn't be surprised if 'nosc' reported it as "unable to connect" with 'rutgers.' nosc has been experiencing some mail problems recently, but I got a node from Ted Medin over the weekend saying they *think* they have the difficulty fixed. Persevere :-) Murph Sewall Vaporware? ---> [Gary Larson returns 1/1/90] Prof. of Marketing Sewall@UConnVM.BITNET Business School sewall%uconnvm.bitnet@mitvma.mit.edu [INTERNET] U of Connecticut {psuvax1 or mcvax }!UCONNVM.BITNET!SEWALL [UUCP] (203) 486-5246 [FAX] (203) 486-2489 [PHONE] 41 49N 72 15W [ICBM] -+- I don't speak for my employer, though I frequently wish that I could (subject to change without notice; void where prohibited)