IRPGMR7@OUACCVMB.BITNET (05/10/89)
I don't mean to be disrespectful to any of the apple people here, but I'm just wondering why I just went through x-number of lines explaining the new aspects of System 7.0 for the Macintosh??? I read through it cause it is very interesting, but it's place probably would have been better in a list such as info-mac ??? This is just a remark, not a flame. I was just wondering why all of the sudden there was so much mac stuff on the info-apple list. David William Wrage a.k.a. The Frenchman 'I don't have a nifty saying yet, but I'll think of one.....' Address: IRPGMR7@OUACCVMB.BITNET
awillis@pro-angmar.UUCP (Albert Willis) (05/11/89)
Network Comment: to #204 by obsolete!IRPGMR7%OUACCVMB.BITNET%cunyvm.cuny.edu
I agree with David William Wrage: System 7.0 is interesting, but it does
really belong on the info-mac feedor whatever. I really want to get back to
System 5.0, new tools, AppleShare for the IIgs, wrap-up of AppleFest and some
juicy rumors I heard there.....
Thanks.
Albert Willis
obsolete!pro-angmar!awillis@bloom-beacon.mit.edu | AppleLink PE: BCS Al
obsolete!pro-angmar!awillis@bu-it.bu.edu | BCS Apple Connection:
pro-angmar!awillis@obsolete.uucp | 617/ 893-5681 [Al]orcus@pro-lep.cts.com (Brian Greenstone) (05/15/89)
Network Comment: to #3329 by pnet01!crash!cunyvm.cuny.edu!IRPGMR7%OUACCVMB.BITNET I think that the Mac conversation is picking up because everyone is realizing that the Apple II is laying on its death bed and they are preparing for the afterlife.