[net.music] Top 40, Am radio, mass culture, snobs

merchant@dartvax.UUCP (06/08/84)

Am I so insecure about my musical taste that I have to invent some excuse
for people who don't share it?  Probably I am.

Personal tastes, as is always said over and over, are personal.  The bit
I said was a piece of personal conviction: I enjoy top 40 music because,
in many ways, I can relate to it.  Yes, I too have had a marvelous time    
dealing with broken hearts, romances, etc., etc., etc.

Your analogy with MacDonald's, though, hits me from a poor angle.  I know
quite a number of people who have tasted marvelous french cooked meals and
still go crazy over your garden variety hamburg.  Maybe not a MacDonald's
or a fast food one, but a hamburger none the less.  Their taste buds have
been given, in theory, marvelous food for so long that they are bored with
it.  It's something new and different and not bad.

I'll admit, Top 40 can be a pretty boring staple.  But I can get bored with
just about any form of music, if I hear too much of it.  I have a friend who
really enjoys Emerson, Lake, and Palmer, as do I.  Yet, if I listen to
ELP for too long, I get bored and sick of it, just like if I listen to
Journey or Asia or whoever too long.

Yet, there are those snobs who got sick of it once and say "I'm never going
to listen to that again."  All I say is that you should vary your musical
listening tastes.  See each piece of music for what it is trying to do.

For example, the new Bruce Springsteen song.  (Hey, we've come around a
full circle.)  It has a kind of upbeat feel to it, it seems like it would
be a good song to dance to.  It's a pop song.  And a very good one, at
that.  Is it true art?  No.  Is it trying to be?  No.  What's the problem?

The true music snobs are those who don't look at songs and try to figure out
what they are trying to do.  They do not appreciate whether it succeeds or
fails.  Instead, they try to make it fit their view of what music "should
be" and, if it fails, it's rubbish and should be banished from the face of
the earth.

But wait!  There's more!  Now, with a wave of my arm, I spin around and
say "That's not bad, though."  You look at your screen and say "What is
Merchant babbling about?"  Well, hold on to your hats, gang, because this
is a doozy.

Music snobs aren't really bad!  They aren't!  They know what they like
and they appreciate what they like.  My only complaint is when they try
to tell me what I should like.  It's like religion.  If you want to believe
one God made the whole universe, marvelous.  You try to make me believe it,
I'll walk out on you.  We all have our preferences as to what we would like
to listen to.  We all look for different things in our music.  The only bad
thing about a music snob is that he tries to push his concept of musical
taste on everyone else.  If he would just understand that not everyone
thinks like he does and that is what makes the world so beautiful, he and
the rest of us would probably be much happier people.
 
There.  See?  No?  Let me give an example: Michael Jackson.  Boo, hiss,
boo, you say.  His music is boring, you say.  He should be taken out
and flogged, you say.  Why would anyone listen to him, you ask.  People
who listen to Michael Jackson are real idiots, you say.  But there you
go again!  He's not trying to be another (insert your favourite non-pop
artist here).  He's producing Top 40 music.  You don't like it?  Fine.
You can say why you don't like it.  Fine.  You start calling me names
because I like it, and I start getting offended.  Who died and made
your musical taste king, I say.  

Well, I think I've ranted and raved long enough.
--
"You've got a hell of a lot to learn about
 Rock And Roll!"     -- Jim Steinman                       Peter Merchant