[net.movies] De Palma: Hitchcock ribute or Ripoff, or??

robison@eosp1.UUCP (Tobias D. Robison) (11/09/84)

In addition to tributes and ripoffs, there is a long artistic tradition
called "parody" (NOT in the modern funny sense! Read on), in which an
artistic work is based upon another artistic work, but is in some ways
more developed, or varied in new directions.  Parodic musical
compositions were very common in the 15th and 16th Centuries in Europe,
and respectable Parodic paintings were, I think, common also.
The music parodies were usually bigger compositions than the works
they were based on.  Some of the greatest music composers of the times
wrote many parodies.

It's a little difficult to explain what the point of parody
compositions is without examples, but there is a similar approach in
many fields of Jazz, where a composition is played in an inventive
way, with variations and complications, but often paying close
attention to the original.  The parody composer draws a great deal
of strength from the structure of the original work, and benefits
from audience recognition, but also contributes a great deal to the
parody composition, which should in fact be a thoroughly original work.

The only De Palma film I ever saw was a short film in 1962,
so I don't have an opinion here, but could these Hitchcokish films be
serious parodies rather than ripoffs or tributes?

For that matter, what IS a "tribute" film?

	- Toby Robison (not Robinson!)
	allegra!eosp1!robison
	or: decvax!ittvax!eosp1!robison
	or (emergency): princeton!eosp1!robison