[comp.sys.apple] Changing computers...

unknown@ucscb.UCSC.EDU (The Unknown User) (10/16/89)

In article <8910140620.AA25938@trout.nosc.mil> chines@pro-europa.cts.com (Clifford Hines) writes:
>Comment to message from: umigw!ibiza!bsherman@handies.ucar.edu (Bob Sherman)
>
>It sounds like Apple is trying to convert us to Macs. By force. Some of us are
>converted. I will get a Mac for my next computer in the future. But Apple's
>actions are going get those Apple II'ers into the MS-DOS camp since some
>people don't like Macs. 
>Just one person crying out in the woods.
>
>Cliff
>
>UUCP: crash!pro-europa!chines
>ARPA: crash!pro-europa!chines@nosc.mil
>INET: chines@pro-europa.cts.com

	Just one quick suggestion. As this article I'm responding to no
longer has to do with my long AppleFest review, it seems it should've had its
subject changed long ago. I hope that's not taken as a whine, it just seems
subjects should be kept SOMEWHAT up to date. It's very similar to the
suggestion that people keep tack of what other newsgroups their posting to!
(After saying that I just went up and checked that it was only going to
comp.sys.apple!)

	But I think you are wrong. When (if???) I stop using my GS as
my main computer, I don't know if I will be going Mac... I sure won't be
going MS-DOS. Unless IBM somehow changes their whole ideology and computers
around, I don't think there's a chance in hell I'll be getting an IBM...

	I think I'll probably get a NeXT (especially if I'm still in
school by the time I want to buy one...God, it's $3500 less than on the
streets!)... Even though the NeXT takes the Mac ideology even farther, it
seems really neat from the little I have used one.. Well, I guess in a way
it takes the Mac ideology farther and in some ways it doesn't. Being under
UNIX seems to make you able to go "low level" on the machine easily, but
it also has the icons/pulldown menus...  [Disclaimer: I do not program
under UNIX and only use it for its most "high level" commands like ls,
cat, more, and some setenv stuff...Just admitting I'm most likely wrong
about that "low level" statement].
--
unknown@ucscb.ucsc.edu