farrier@Apple.COM (Cary Farrier) (01/16/90)
[The original of this was sent with lines beginning with "From ", which causes many mailers, including the standard Beserkeley mailer, to choke big time. My posting mailbox has been totally hosed by this (I'm sure unintentionally), and I have received literally hundreds of partial copies of this message, so in the future please do not send voter lists that have all the lines beginning with "From ". The followup had lines beginning with >From which isn't much better because it gets rejected by "inews" due to too much included text. To get this posted I had to hand-edit it and strip out the >From from all the voter names. P.S. Some unrelated postings may have been unintentionally lost in the deluge, so if you posted something which doesn't show up in the next day or so, please repost. --moderator] The results of the voting on the comp.sys.apple2.tech newsgroup are in: YES: 90 NO: 30 According to the newsgroup creation guidelines, there must be at least 100 more 'yes' votes than 'no' votes, a criteria which was not met; therefore the newsgroup comp.sys.apple2.tech will not be created. Listed below are the addresses of the votes received. My thanks to all those who took the time to send in their votes (both yes and no votes). Cary Farrier YES Votes: fadden@cory.Berkeley.EDU Wed Dec 13 18:02:09 1989 rck@alpha.ces.cwru.edu Wed Dec 13 18:08:47 1989 claris!jazzman Wed Dec 13 18:10:46 1989 mccann@plains.NoDak.edu Wed Dec 13 18:12:05 1989 bridson@primate.wisc.edu Wed Dec 13 18:48:55 1989 jac@paul.rutgers.edu Wed Dec 13 19:01:45 1989 rankins@multinomial.crd.ge.com Wed Dec 13 20:06:23 1989 mhamaoka@ATHENA.MIT.EDU Wed Dec 13 20:36:59 1989 c60b2-ar@garnet.berkeley.edu Wed Dec 13 20:44:33 1989 bsherman@mthvax.CS.Miami.EDU Wed Dec 13 21:50:53 1989 ctuel@polyslo.CalPoly.EDU Wed Dec 13 22:20:17 1989 krb20699@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu Thu Dec 14 00:09:49 1989 Tabakal@ub.cc.umich.edu Thu Dec 14 07:16:24 1989 shatara@memit.enet.dec.com Thu Dec 14 07:56:48 1989 ames!garp!mit-eddie!alliant!muller Thu Dec 14 08:15:48 1989 cuphub!bar5834@cs.pitt.edu Thu Dec 14 08:17:47 1989 @po3.andrew.cmu.edu:gt0t+@andrew.cmu.edu Thu Dec 14 08:30:31 1989 estell@cs.uiuc.edu Thu Dec 14 08:34:13 1989 cullen@cs.Buffalo.EDU Thu Dec 14 09:01:45 1989 palermo@en.ecn.purdue.edu Thu Dec 14 09:09:22 1989 hartkopf@tramp.Colorado.EDU Thu Dec 14 10:33:29 1989 ccastbs@prism.gatech.edu Thu Dec 14 11:16:27 1989 kuo@snoopy.Colorado.EDU Thu Dec 14 11:21:50 1989 pnakada@pnakada.oracle.com Thu Dec 14 12:10:11 1989 slabovit@BLACKBIRD.AFIT.AF.MIL Thu Dec 14 12:20:03 1989 @po2.andrew.cmu.edu:bh1e+@andrew.cmu.edu Thu Dec 14 12:23:57 1989 dickson%girtab.usc.edu@usc.edu Thu Dec 14 13:37:33 1989 Orion@cup.portal.com Thu Dec 14 13:51:56 1989 steve@chimayo.unm.edu Thu Dec 14 14:01:18 1989 roy@shumv1.ncsu.edu Thu Dec 14 17:48:03 1989 mattd Thu Dec 14 18:33:27 1989 aj0@sage.cc.purdue.edu Thu Dec 14 21:08:45 1989 crash!pnet01!pnet07!pro-grouch!danield@trout.nosc.mil Fri Dec 15 00:07:16 1989 crash!pnet01!pro-simasd!pro-exchange!rich@trout.nosc.mil Fri Dec 15 03:21:36 1989 bungia!orbit!pnet51!dougm Fri Dec 15 08:49:22 1989 razeh@rodan.acs.syr.edu Fri Dec 15 09:31:26 1989 CARPENTR@SERVAX.BITNET Fri Dec 15 12:36:46 1989 schissel@phoenix.Princeton.EDU Fri Dec 15 13:17:42 1989 blochowi%garfield.cs.wisc.edu@cs.wisc.edu Fri Dec 15 13:50:53 1989 TAYLORJ@BYUVAX.BITNET Fri Dec 15 19:28:53 1989 marque!studsys!buchho@uunet.UU.NET Fri Dec 15 21:34:03 1989 throoph@jacobs.CS.ORST.EDU Fri Dec 15 22:45:33 1989 @RELAY.CS.NET:nicholaA%moravian.edu@catwoman.moravian.edu Sat Dec 16 00:13:26 1989 crash!pnet01!pnet51!pro-abyss!dwelliver@trout.nosc.mil Sat Dec 16 06:05:42 1989 bungia!orbit!pnet51!dickhp Sat Dec 16 07:46:53 1989 crash!danr@trout.nosc.mil Sat Dec 16 15:38:51 1989 crash!pnet01!pro-simasd!pro-avalon!jeffj@trout.nosc.mil Sat Dec 16 23:07:35 1989 ames!lll-winken!uwm!carroll1!acct069 Sun Dec 17 10:40:07 1989 steven@enel.UCalgary.CA Sun Dec 17 15:15:52 1989 MMPR004@ECNCDC.BITNET Sun Dec 17 17:02:04 1989 munnari!fawlty.towers.oz.au!johnmac@uunet.UU.NET Sun Dec 17 22:11:55 1989 crash!pnet01!pnet07!pro-grouch!pro-realm!pro-graphics!bobl@trout.nosc.mil Mon Dec 18 00:06:39 1989 microsoft!roberth@beaver.cs.washington.edu Mon Dec 18 07:23:24 1989 dcw@sun-bear.LCS.MIT.EDU Mon Dec 18 08:21:03 1989 @CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU:ERAN@BGUNVE Tue Dec 19 03:58:49 1989 IRPGMR7@OUACCVMB.BITNET Tue Dec 19 08:01:25 1989 alf@clinet.FI Tue Dec 19 12:43:41 1989 rang@cs.wisc.edu Tue Dec 19 13:28:53 1989 ames!mailrus!wuarchive!texbell!nuchat!paulh Tue Dec 19 20:35:27 1989 rick@pavlov.bcm.tmc.edu Wed Dec 20 09:20:24 1989 sunpix!matthew@East.Sun.COM Sat Dec 23 12:58:13 1989 @NISCA.IRCC.OHIO-STATE.EDU:jak@hpuxa.ircc.ohio-state.edu Thu Dec 28 23:57:32 1989 shankar@src.honeywell.com Sat Dec 30 16:13:12 1989 bungia!orbit!pnet51!stgeorge Sun Dec 31 15:12:42 1989 ames!mailrus!wuarchive!texbell!nuchat!jeffn Mon Jan 1 01:25:11 1990 spike@world.std.com Wed Jan 3 12:55:25 1990 cfctech!ttardis!rlw@sharkey.cc.umich.edu Thu Jan 4 09:23:07 1990 roy@shumv1.ncsu.edu Fri Jan 5 15:41:48 1990 hanson@watsci.waterloo.edu Fri Jan 5 16:28:28 1990 billg%quacky.mips.com@mips.com Fri Jan 5 17:29:17 1990 lunatic@ucscb.UCSC.EDU Fri Jan 5 19:25:38 1990 irie2%husc8@harvard.harvard.edu Sat Jan 6 09:05:51 1990 jeffd@csd4.csd.uwm.edu Sat Jan 6 18:07:46 1990 mahan@hpuxa.ircc.ohio-state.edu Sat Jan 6 18:15:37 1990 acm@fermi.CES.CWRU.Edu Sat Jan 6 18:17:16 1990 dseah@wpi.wpi.edu Sun Jan 7 10:22:20 1990 tippy!buzz@newton.physics.purdue.edu Sun Jan 7 14:36:51 1990 kadickey@phoenix.Princeton.EDU Sun Jan 7 18:44:10 1990 pa1017%sdcc13@ucsd.edu Sun Jan 7 19:10:13 1990 kpfleger@phoenix.Princeton.EDU Sun Jan 7 19:26:00 1990 DAVE@WALLY.MCEO.DG.COM Mon Jan 8 09:58:13 1990 alan%essex.ac.uk@NSFnet-Relay.AC.UK Tue Jan 9 02:55:22 1990 HOWARD@UTKVX2.BITNET Tue Jan 9 11:12:42 1990 greyelf@wpi.wpi.edu Tue Jan 9 17:18:12 1990 n8948315@unicorn.wwu.edu Tue Jan 9 20:12:05 1990 hayes Wed Jan 10 19:16:05 1990 munnari!wolfen.cc.uow.oz.au!david@uunet.UU.NET Wed Jan 10 22:48:25 1990 cyliao@mordor.eng.umd.edu Thu Jan 11 15:04:31 1990 @ARPA.ATT.COM:cbnewsd!bird@att.att.com Fri Jan 12 08:13:06 1990 whitesel@csvax.caltech.edu Sun Jan 14 12:34:36 1990 NO Votes: icsu6000@caesar.cs.montana.edu Wed Dec 13 20:34:56 1989 wilken@plains.NoDak.edu Wed Dec 13 20:49:02 1989 @SMOKE.BRL.MIL:abc@BRL.ARPA Wed Dec 13 20:58:55 1989 UD182050@VM1.NoDak.EDU Wed Dec 13 21:31:33 1989 @SMOKE.BRL.MIL:gwyn@BRL.ARPA Thu Dec 14 00:03:07 1989 @CORNELLC.cit.cornell.edu:lwv27@CAS Thu Dec 14 04:17:37 1989 @RELAY.CS.NET:rsalz%bbn.com@PINEAPPLE.BBN.COM Thu Dec 14 05:06:58 1989 munnari!mullian.ee.mu.OZ.AU!ianr@uunet.UU.NET Thu Dec 14 05:52:10 1989 howard@53iss6.Waterloo.NCR.COM Thu Dec 14 06:11:12 1989 bungia!dayton!jad Thu Dec 14 08:01:30 1989 mek4_ltd@uhura.cc.rochester.edu Thu Dec 14 08:09:15 1989 pyramid!swbatl!texbell!chinacat!chip Thu Dec 14 11:52:48 1989 SEWALL@UCONNVM.BITNET Thu Dec 14 13:38:48 1989 marc%zoom@IRO.UMontreal.CA Thu Dec 14 18:53:24 1989 peirce@gumby.cc.wmich.edu Fri Dec 15 06:04:50 1989 ames!pacbell!pbhyd!ldcol Fri Dec 15 19:56:59 1989 ames!mailrus!uunet!microsoft!brianw Sat Dec 16 16:35:17 1989 Q4KX@CORNELLA.cit.cornell.edu Sat Dec 16 18:07:30 1989 TMPLee.TIS@DOCKMASTER.NCSC.MIL Sat Dec 16 21:48:49 1989 oplinger@ra.crd.ge.com Mon Dec 18 11:21:53 1989 bcstec!tahoma!prl3546@uunet.UU.NET Mon Dec 18 11:47:21 1989 joseph@elbereth.rutgers.edu Mon Dec 18 15:08:44 1989 mitel!sce!cognos!alzabo!kebera@uunet.UU.NET Mon Dec 18 18:14:30 1989 UNESTJ@UNCVX1.BITNET Mon Dec 18 21:02:05 1989 crash!pnet01!pro-simasd!pro-generic!ericmcg@trout.nosc.mil Wed Dec 20 00:07:06 1989 davidbrierley@lynx.northeastern.edu Tue Jan 2 07:35:42 1990 MAR21AA@TECHNION.BITNET Thu Jan 4 10:59:10 1990 grio@cs.psu.edu Fri Jan 5 12:20:23 1990 csusac!rohwerwd@ucdavis.edu Sat Jan 6 22:40:30 1990 ajs33293@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu Wed Jan 10 18:01:18 1990 -- +---------------------------------------+---------------------------------+ | Cary Farrier | Internet : farrier@apple.com | | Apple II Systems Software Engineering | UUCP : apple!farrier | | Apple Computer, Inc. | Fax : (408) 974-1704 | | 20525 Mariani Ave. | AppleLink : FARRIER | | Cupertino, CA 95014 | or farrier@applelink.apple.com | +---------------------------------------+---------------------------------+ | I don't speak for Apple Computer, our products do. | +-------------------------------------------------------------------------+
SEWALL@UCONNVM.BITNET (Murph Sewall) (01/17/90)
On Mon, 15 Jan 90 17:28:54 GMT Cary Farrier said: >The results of the voting on the comp.sys.apple2.tech newsgroup are in: > > YES: 90 > NO: 30 Gee, only 120 votes total? Considering the verbosity of this group, either we are (a little more than) 120 REAL chatterboxes, or (more likely I think) there's a powerful lot of apathy out there. I wonder how many folks failed to vote properly (sent a comment to comp.sys.apple instead of email to Farrier@Apple.COM)? I'd guess that changing the name from comp.sys.apple to comp.sys.apple2 would be a LOT less controversial (anyone planning to vote 'no'??), but taking a vote will not be worth the trouble (might even lead the powers that be to question the cost-benefit of comp.sys.apple) if we can only muster 120 voters :-( /s Murph <Sewall%UConnVM.BITNET@CUNYVM.CUNY.Edu> [Internet] or ...{psuvax1 or mcvax}!uconnvm.bitnet!sewall [UUCP] + Standard disclaimer applies ("The opinions expressed are my own" etc.)
bsherman@mthvax.cs.miami.edu (Bob Sherman) (01/18/90)
In article <9001171452.AA12562@apple.com> SEWALL@UCONNVM.BITNET (Murph Sewall) writes: >On Mon, 15 Jan 90 17:28:54 GMT Cary Farrier said: >>The results of the voting on the comp.sys.apple2.tech newsgroup are in: >> >> YES: 90 >> NO: 30 >Gee, only 120 votes total? Considering the verbosity of this group, either >we are (a little more than) 120 REAL chatterboxes, or (more likely I think) >there's a powerful lot of apathy out there. I wonder how many folks failed >to vote properly (sent a comment to comp.sys.apple instead of email to >Farrier@Apple.COM)? >I'd guess that changing the name from comp.sys.apple to comp.sys.apple2 >would be a LOT less controversial (anyone planning to vote 'no'??), but >taking a vote will not be worth the trouble (might even lead the powers that >be to question the cost-benefit of comp.sys.apple) if we can only muster 120 voters :-( Ah yes Murph, as much as I am afraid to say it (and I'm sure I will have to duck some torch flames), I think you have hit the so called nail right on the head.. We seem to have a lot of "criers" around here, they yell, scream, and shed tears over what they claim is not going the way they want it to go, and they excell at "doom & gloom" fables, BUT they do not know how to, or do not care to take any positive steps to actually get something positive done.. By gosh, Apple is willing to take the time to sponsor a technical forum for the Apple II world (hey folks, Apple is showing intent to DO SOMETHING in the Apple II world) and what happens? the "criers" go to sleep at the switch.. But next week I'll wager that they will be back with their next chapter of "doom & gloom".. The same thing no doubt applies to the appeal from Jerry Cline for positive input for the Apple II folks that he met with.. The same do nothing types will continue to cry, but nothing else.. By golly, if you don't have an account on AOL, then beg, borrow or whatever 5 minutes worth of time from someone that does, and get your letter sent. If you cannot do it that way, then I am sure you could send written letters to any board member of the Apple Developers Association (Barney Stone, Roger Wagner, among many others) and ask them to forward the letter to the Apple II marketing folks.. They know who they are, after all, they have also been meeting with them.. If all of the above fails, check on the bottom of your trusty Apple, or on an Apple drive or whatever, and there you should find the address for Apple, write a letter and send it to that address, attention of the Director of Marketing, Apple II Division, and I'm sure it will get to the right mail stop.. It really matters not which way you do it, BUT DO IT NOW.. You should not have the right to cry later, if you don't speak up now!! We have already lost the Apple Tech feed here from lack of interest, let's not loose whatever the future may hold in the Apple II world for the same reason. If the Apple II is going to sink, let's make it sink from the weight of our letters, not from the lack of interest.. -- bsherman@mthvax.cs.miami.edu | bsherman@pro-exchange | MCI MAIL: BSHERMAN >> Miami's Big Apple - 305-948-8000 - 24 hours - 300/1200 - PCP'able << >> Oldest Apple support board in Southeast. Now in it's ninth year. <<
gwyn@smoke.BRL.MIL (Doug Gwyn) (01/18/90)
In article <1504@umigw.MIAMI.EDU> bsherman@mthvax.cs.miami.edu (Bob Sherman) writes: >By gosh, Apple is willing to take the time to sponsor a technical >forum for the Apple II world (hey folks, Apple is showing intent to >DO SOMETHING in the Apple II world) and what happens? the "criers" go >to sleep at the switch.. If you're referring to the call for creation of comp.sys.apple2.tech, I'd wager that most of the 30 "No" voters didn't think it would help. comp.sys.apple (whose name I wouldn't mind changing to comp.sys.apple2 to scare the Macintosh folks away) already serves as an unmoderated Apple II technical newsgroup. If it isn't very useful, then neither would comp.sys.apple2.tech be some time after it got rolling.
jearls@polyslo.CalPoly.EDU ( Stupid ) (01/19/90)
gwyn@brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn) says:
[stuff deleted]
>comp.sys.apple (whose name I wouldn't mind changing to comp.sys.apple2
[stuff deleted]
When is the voting period for changing comp.sys.apple to comp.sys.apple2
going to be? (Or is it not going to be :-)
- JohN
--
_______________________________________________________________________________
Stupid@Idiots.Anonymous.Com | There's an explanation for everything. Tis a pity
jearls@polyslo.CalPoly.EDU | that many of those explanations make no sense.
earlsj@AFAL-EDWARDS.AF.MIL | - The Teachings of Ebenezum, volume LXIXjb10320@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Jawaid Bazyar) (01/19/90)
In article <1504@umigw.MIAMI.EDU> bsherman@mthvax.cs.miami.edu (Bob Sherman) writes: >In article <9001171452.AA12562@apple.com> SEWALL@UCONNVM.BITNET (Murph Sewall) writes: > [stuff about "bitchers" deleted] >It really matters not which way you do it, BUT DO IT NOW.. You should not >have the right to cry later, if you don't speak up now!! > >We have already lost the Apple Tech feed here from lack of interest, let's >not loose whatever the future may hold in the Apple II world for the same >reason. If the Apple II is going to sink, let's make it sink from the >weight of our letters, not from the lack of interest.. > >-- > bsherman@mthvax.cs.miami.edu | bsherman@pro-exchange | MCI MAIL: BSHERMAN >>> Miami's Big Apple - 305-948-8000 - 24 hours - 300/1200 - PCP'able << >>> Oldest Apple support board in Southeast. Now in it's ninth year. << Well put Bob. Perhaps a net-wide open letter, much like the one used to defeat the FCC Modem Tax would be in order? Also, for those of you who use BBS's in your locality, take it upon yourselves to solicit input from the users of these BBS's. That's what I'm doing right now. Collect it all and E-mail or whatever to the right people. In other words, we all know the GS could be better, so let's DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT. Get INVOLVED (ooh, that word that Americans hate to hear). The Future of the Apple // is WHAT YOU MAKE IT. -- Jawaid Bazyar | This message was posted to thousands of machines Junior/Computer Engineering | throughout the entire civilized world. It cost jb10320@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu | the net hundreds, maybe thousands of dollars.
TE880714%STUDTEW.UFSIA.AC.BE@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU (Stef Bracke) (01/19/90)
I am very sorry I did not vote, but
I think I do not understand the whole COMP.SYS... affair.
Is that a BBS or something? I only receive INFO-APPLE and
APPLE2-L but no trace of COMP.SYS..
Also, I like to work with ZMODEM. Someone advised to download
it from a BBS; pretty costly if you phone from Europe. If have
a free account on EARN, so maybe I can get it through there. (Using
APPLE2-L I bet|)
Greetings,
Stef Bracke
Deurne, Belgium, Europespike@world.std.com (Joe Ilacqua) (01/19/90)
In article <25b6015a.211d@polyslo.CalPoly.EDU> jearls@polyslo.CalPoly.EDU ( Stupid ) writes:
<When is the voting period for changing comp.sys.apple to comp.sys.apple2
<going to be? (Or is it not going to be :-)
If all goes well it will start Sunday the 21th and run the
required 30 days. (of course if uunet does come back up...)
->Spike
--
"The World" - Public Access Unix - +1 617-739-9753 24hrs {3,12,24}00bpslvirden@pro-tcc.cts.com (Larry Virden) (01/20/90)
In-Reply-To: message from farrier@Apple.COM
Cary, I just did a rough check today at work on comp.sys.apple. Out of a
weeks worth of messages there were approx. 130 different folks posting. So
your stats sound pretty good actually. If there are really only 150 or so
regular users of this group, with lots of occasional noise and LOADS of
readers, then you got a pretty good turnout. What I found was that we had to
try about 2-3 times before we got the comp.binaries.apple2 group created! And
before that, there was a semi-band on any postings of programs whatsoever
cause some folk preferred not to get the programs in their mailboxes. Esp
when things like rogue's 30 (or was that 100?) messages went out!
--
Larry W. Virden ProLine: pro-tcc!lvirden
674 Falls Place Work: lvirden@cas.bitnet
Reynoldsburg, OH 43068-1614 Aline: LVIRDEN
CIS: 75046,606cyliao@eng.umd.edu (Chun-Yao Liao) (01/21/90)
In article <9001171452.AA12562@apple.com> SEWALL@UCONNVM.BITNET (Murph Sewall) writes: >On Mon, 15 Jan 90 17:28:54 GMT Cary Farrier said: >>The results of the voting on the comp.sys.apple2.tech newsgroup are in: >> >> YES: 90 >> NO: 30 > >Gee, only 120 votes total? Considering the verbosity of this group, either >we are (a little more than) 120 REAL chatterboxes, or (more likely I think) >there's a powerful lot of apathy out there. I wonder how many folks failed >to vote properly (sent a comment to comp.sys.apple instead of email to >Farrier@Apple.COM)? > >I'd guess that changing the name from comp.sys.apple to comp.sys.apple2 >would be a LOT less controversial (anyone planning to vote 'no'??), but >taking a vote will not be worth the trouble (might even lead the powers that >be to question the cost-benefit of comp.sys.apple) if we can only muster >120 voters :-( > >/s Murph <Sewall%UConnVM.BITNET@CUNYVM.CUNY.Edu> [Internet] > or ...{psuvax1 or mcvax}!uconnvm.bitnet!sewall [UUCP] > + Standard disclaimer applies ("The opinions expressed are my own" etc.) Yeah, only 120 votes, it surprised me too. But I guess that since the vote performed during the winterbreak, perhaps lots people didn't read the news- group these days. Maybe we should consider to vote again after schools begin. my school begins on Jan 22nd, 90. -- |I want Rocket Chip 10 MHz, Z-Ram Ultra II, UniDisk 3.5 | cyliao@wam.umd.edu | |I want my own NeXT, 64 Mb RAM, 660 Mb SCSI, NeXT laser | Chun Yao Liao | | printer, net connection, software, color.| Accepting Donations!| /* If (my_.signature =~ yours) coincidence = true; else ignore_this = true; */
SEWALL@UCONNVM.BITNET (Murph Sewall) (01/21/90)
On Fri, 19 Jan 90 19:14:07 EST you said: >readers, then you got a pretty good turnout. What I found was that we had to >try about 2-3 times before we got the comp.binaries.apple2 group created! I'd expect there'll be more votes for comp.sys.apple2.tech if a moderator (being an editor is NOT necessary) can be found. For a good example of that sort of list see info-kermit. /s Murph <Sewall%UConnVM.BITNET@CUNYVM.CUNY.Edu> [Internet] or ...{psuvax1 or mcvax}!uconnvm.bitnet!sewall [UUCP] + Standard disclaimer applies ("The opinions expressed are my own" etc.)
mitch@rbdc.UUCP (Mitch Berry) (01/22/90)
In article <1990Jan20.185907.18503@eng.umd.edu> cyliao@eng.umd.edu (Chun-Yao Liao) writes: >Yeah, only 120 votes, it surprised me too. But I guess that since the vote >performed during the winterbreak, perhaps lots people didn't read the news- >group these days. Maybe we should consider to vote again after schools begin. >my school begins on Jan 22nd, 90. well actually thats a good idea to make sure its during the school season is in that way more of the people have access to their unix systems...i dont remember what time of year the first one was ran...i know i voted yes though. THrashing Rage Organization: Thrashing Rage @ RBDC Public Access UNIX Keywords:
sb@pro-generic.cts.com (Stephen Brown) (02/04/90)
In-Reply-To: message from farrier@Apple.COM In this article, Cary Farrier says: [snip] >but I'm pressed for time right now. [snip] >I won't >have time for about 6 months. [snip] >| Cary Farrier | Internet : farrier@apple.com | >| Apple II Systems Software Engineering | UUCP : apple!farrier | [snip] This DOES look like a good sign, doesn't it! Perhaps System Software 6.0...? Maybe more? Long Live the Apple II. (The true Father of Apple Computer, Inc., and most certainly its saviour) UUCP: crash!pro-generic!sb ARPA: crash!pro-generic!sb@nosc.mil INET: sb@pro-generic.cts.com